摘要
《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》与国际商业惯例作为私法规范,它们在适用方式上都具有任意性。但二者在任意适用的意思表示上具有明显的差异,并由此造成了公约和国际贸易惯例适用条件的不同。由于对公约和国际贸易惯例的适用方式及其中国相关适用规定的片面理解,目前在中国的国际贸易司法实践中存在着一些不当做法。
The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods （CISG） and the International Trade Usage are the outcome of the unification of international sales law, which promotes the development of international trade. These two laws have clear difference in their freely application, which formed different applications of the contract and the usage. Due to the one-sided view to the application of the two laws and the Chinese relevant regulations, there are some improper practices in Chinese judicature.
出处
《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2007年第1期47-54,共8页
Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
关键词
任意性
明示
默示
司法实践
optional rules
express application
implicit application
Chinese judicature
