期刊文献+

婚恋匹配中个性因素影响的研究 被引量:2

The effect of individuality on pairing of couples
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国国人的婚姻模式已越来越不能适应社会和文化的发展,为了实现现代人更加幸福、美满的恋爱和婚姻,本研究立意探索构建理想婚姻的性格因素匹配模式,为现代人提供科学、理性的选择配偶的建议。通过参阅大量国内外恋爱心理的文献和资料,在知名婚恋专家、心理学家指导下,本研究编制出一套性格商值测题。测题提取出两性交往中发挥重要作用的恋父(母)情感、性欲求能力、性格内外向、情感交流、适应能力、人生态度及生活情趣这些主要因素,试图分析个人在恋爱过程中的性格情感状态,找到一定的匹配规律。经过一定数量成功恋人和恩爱夫妻的测试,经分析表明两性交往中确实存在着性格成功匹配的相应模式,性格匹配的相似性原理和互补性原则往往在交往过程中发挥作用。本研究通过了解异性双方的性格特征,可以指导人们进行更科学的择偶,以促进现代人幸福婚姻的实现。 The marriage mode of Chinese people could not adapt to the development of modern society and culture. In order to make people have happy love and marriage, this study aims at constructing an ideal marriage pairing morde and providing rational and scientific suggestions for young people. This study produced a set of questions concerning personality quotient based on literatures about love psychology. Attempts were made to analyze th emotional state of lovers and seek for certain paring principles. After studying a certain number of successful lovers and couples, we found two principles, namely, the principles of similarity and compatibility play greater role in the communication between the lovers and couples. The result of this study supports the idea that the understanding of lovers' personality can be helpful in guiding the selection of their lovers and the construction of a happy marriage.
作者 周正猷 张丽
出处 《中国性科学》 2007年第3期8-11,共4页 Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
关键词 爱之图 个性相容性 匹配规律 相似性原理 互补性原则 The vision of love Personality tolerability Pairing principles Principles of similarity Principles of compatibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献9

共引文献124

同被引文献74

  • 1Alvarez, L., & Jaffe, K. (2004). Narcissism guides mate selection: Humans mate assortatively, as revealed by facial resenrblance, following an algorithm of "self seeking like". Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 177-194.
  • 2Aranz-Beeker, O. (2013). Effects of similarity of life goals, values, and personality on relationship satisfaction and stability: Findings from a two-wave panel study.Personal Relationstffps, 20, 443-461.
  • 3Beeker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. The Journal of Political Economy, 81,813-846.
  • 4Bohns, V. K., Lucas, G. M., Molden, D. C., Finkel, E. J., Coolsen, M. K., Kumashiro, M., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Opposites fit: Regulatory focus complementarity and relationship well-being Social Cognition, 31, 1-14.
  • 5Bovet, J., Barthes J., Durand, V., Raymond, M., & Alvergne, A. (2012). Men' s preferences for women's facial features: Testing homogamy and the paternity uncertainty hypothesis. PLoS ONE, 7, e49791.
  • 6Burriss, R. P., Roberts, S. C., Welling, L. L., Puts, D. A., & Little, A. C. (2011). Heterosexual romantie couples mate assortatively for facial symmetry, but not maseulinity. Personah"O, and Socinl Psychology Bulle6n, 37, 601-613.
  • 7Buss, D. M. (1984). Marital assortment for personality dispositions: Assessment with three different data sources. Behavior C, enegcs, 14, 111 - 123.
  • 8Byrne, D., Ervin, C., & Lamberth, J. (1970). Continuity between the experimental study of ara'action and real-life computer dating. Journal of Personality and Social Psycbology, 16, 157-165.
  • 9Chen, H., Luo, S., Yue, G., Xu, D., & Zhao-Yang, R. (2009). Do birds of a feather flock together in China? PersonalRelationsl'n'ps, 16, 167-186.
  • 10Chi, P., Epstein, N. B., Fang, X., Lam, D. O., & Li, X. (2013). Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples. JoumM of Family Psychology, 27, 806- 816.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部