期刊文献+

基于包含度理论的软件可靠性多模型综合动态预计 被引量:1

Multi-model synthesis dynamic prediction of software reliability based on inclusion degree theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对软件可靠性工程领域中存在的不同模型预计相同软件可靠性结果不一致、同一软件的失效过程本身不能用单个模型描述的问题,提出了基于包含度理论的软件可靠性多模型综合动态预计方法。首先定义了基于包含度理论的属性重要度,并给出了一种选择包含度函数的方法,然后给出了软件可靠性多模型综合动态预计的步骤。该方法综合了各种可靠性模型的特点(优点),动态地改变各分模型的权重,使不同类型和特性的模型互相补偿,较好地解决了软件工程中的实际问题。最后通过实例分析验证了该方法的有效性。 Different reliability models result in different reliability predictions for the same software, and failed process of the same software could not be described using a single model in software reliability project. Concerning these problems, a multi-model synthesis dynamic prediction method for software reliability based on inclusion degree theory was proposed. The definition of attribute importance degree based on inclusion degree theory and a select method of inclusion degree function were presented. Then the process of multi-model synthesis dynamic prediction for software reliability was put forward. This method integrates the strong points of various models and makes in-homogeneity model compensating each other through dynamic changing their weights, which can solve the practical problems in software engineering. A case study was done to demonstrate the feasibility of this method.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期387-388,393,共3页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国防基础研究基金项目
关键词 包含度理论 软件可靠性 多模型综合 动态预计 inclusion degree theory software reliability multi-model synthesis dynamic prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献21

  • 1王郁,预测,1998年,5期
  • 2王景,1997年中国控制与决策学术年会论文集,1997年,1038页
  • 3唐小我,电子科技大学学报,1997年,3期
  • 4Zeng Yong,J University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,1996年,1期,87页
  • 5曹长修,预测,1996年,5期
  • 6王景,预测,1996年,4期
  • 7傅庚,电子科技大学学报,1995年,2期
  • 8唐小我,预测,1994年,3期
  • 9曾勇,预测,1994年,5期
  • 10唐小我,管理现代化,1992年,1期

共引文献167

同被引文献17

  • 1张雪松,郭平.基于组合神经网络的软件可靠性预测研究[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(6):599-603. 被引量:5
  • 2马飒飒,陈自力,赵守伟.软件可靠性及可靠性多模型综合研究[J].微计算机信息,2006,22(06X):263-265. 被引量:11
  • 3吴勤,侯朝桢,原菊梅.软件可靠性多模型综合的预测方法[J].计算机工程,2006,32(23):214-215. 被引量:4
  • 4Karunanithi N,Whitley D,Malaiya Y K.Prediction of software reliability using connectionist models[J].IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,1992,18(7):563-574.
  • 5Khoshgoftaar T M,Szabo R M.Using neural networks to predict software faults during testing[J].IEEE Trasactions on Reliability,1996,45(3):456-462.
  • 6Sherer S A.Software fault prediction[J].Journal of System and Software,1995,29(2):97-105.
  • 7Sitte R.Compareson of software-reliability-growth predictions:neural networks vs parametric-recalibration[J].IEEE Trasactions on Reliability,1999,48(3):285-291.
  • 8Cai K Y,CAI Lin,WANG Wei-dong,et al.On the neural network approach in software reliability modeling[J].TheJournal of Systems and Software,2001,58(1):47-62.
  • 9Phame H.Reliability handbook[S].NewYork:Springer Verlag,2002.
  • 10Lyu M R,Nikora A.Applying reliability models more effectively[J].IEEE Software,1992,9(4):43-52.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部