期刊文献+

大学生社交效能感量表的初步编制研究 被引量:2

A Study on University Students Social Self-Efficacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究通过探索性因素分析抽取了大学生社交效能感量表的5个因素,分别是应对陌生人、社交信心、亲和力、社交主动、应对社交困境,再通过验证性因素分析检验,确定了量表五因素结构模型。通过信效度分析,表明量表具有较好的稳定性和有效性,达到了心理测量学的要求,可以用于大学生社交效能感状况的测量,为大学生社交效能感的进一步研究提供了研究工具。 By exploring factor method and validate factor-analysis,this study probes into five factors construction of the social self-efficacy scale.The factors are communication with stranger efficacy,expression with confidence efficacy,affinity efficacy,and active interaction efficacy,coping with social difficulties.The scale has high reliability and high validity,which reach the standard of psychometrics?£The scale has both theoretical value and practical value in the evaluating university students' social self-efficacy and providing the tool for deeper study.
出处 《海峡科学》 2007年第2期42-45,共4页 Straits Science
关键词 大学生 社交效能感 量表 University Students Social Self-Efficacy Scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Hough L M, Oswald F L. Personnel selection: Looking toward the future -Remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology,2000, 51:631-664
  • 2Lin R L. Educational Measurement. 3rd edition. New York:Macmillian Publishing Co. , 1989
  • 3Sackett P R, Dreher G F. Constructs and assessment center dimension: some troubling empirical findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67:401-410
  • 4Neiding R D, Neidig P J Multiple assessment center exercise and job relatedness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69: 182-186
  • 5Shore T H, Thornton G C, Shore L M. Construct validity of two categories of assessment center dimension ratings. Personnel Psychology, 1990, 43(1) :101-116
  • 6Sackett P R, Harris, M M. A further examination of the constructs underlying assessment center ratings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1988, 3(2):214-229
  • 7Bycio P, Alvares K M, Hahn J. Situational specificity in assessment center ratings: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72:463-474
  • 8Fleenor J W. Constructs and developmental assessment centers:Further troubling empirical findings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1996, 10(3):319-335
  • 9Joyce L W, Thayer P W, Pond S B. Managerial functions: An alteruative to traditional assessment center dimensions? Personnel Psycholgy, 1994, 47(1): 109-121
  • 10Kleinmann M, Koller O. Construct validity of assessment centers:Appropriate use of confirmatory factor analysis and suitable construction principles. In: Riggio R E, et al ed. AC Research and Applications, 1997. 13-52

共引文献36

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部