法律如何在“社会情境”下存在——读昂格尔的《批判法学运动》被引量：2

How does Law Exist under Social Context——Review on The Critical Legal Studies Movement written by Roberto Unger

下载PDF

导出

摘要在对自由主义法学传统中的形式主义和客观主义批判的基础上,昂格尔提出“偏差原则”与重塑民主和市场制度形式的主张。这其中,以对法律与社会的适当关系的认知为理论支撑点,以权利体系的重新规定为主要内容之一。认为制度设计和“社会情境”的相互彰显是昂格尔思想中的核心之一,故以其为切入点,围绕法律如何在“社会情境”下存在这一问题,分析昂格尔意义下的“社会情境”的理论内涵和这一场景下昂格尔对法律中权利体系的方案设计,并对其理论构想的成立与否做出评价。 On the basis of criticism to formalism and objectivism in liberalism legal tradition, Roberto Unger offered deviationist doctrine and proposition of reconstructing systematic model of democracy and market. This proposition is supported by recognition which requests appropriate relationship between law and society and re-prescription of rights＇ system is one of its important contents. I argue that one of nuclear thoughts of Unger is interactional relationship between systematic design and social context. So beginning with it, I discuss how law exists under social context and analyze the theorctical contents of social context from Unger＇s sense and his project of legal rights＇ system under this context. At last,l give my evaluation to Unger＇s theoretical construction.

作者张翠梅

机构地区哈尔滨工程大学人文社会科学学院

出处《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期2-6,共5页 Hebei Law Science

关键词社会情境构成性情境偏差原则不稳定权利 social context formative contexts deviationist doctrine destabilization rights

分类号 D90 [政治法律—法学理论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Calvin Woodard,Toward a"Super Liberal State",The New York Times,Sunday,November 23,1986,Section 7,Page 27.
2Roberto Mangabeira Unger,The critical legal studies movement,Harvard University Press,1983,p1,2,p9,p17,p22,p23,p23,p18,p26,p31,32,36,p39,p53,60,80,110.
3Roberto Mangabeira Unger,Social theory:its situation and its task,London:Verso,2004,p62.Roberto Mangabeira Unger,False necessity:anti-necessitarian social theory in the service of radical democracy:from Politics,a work in constructive social theory,London; New York:Verso,2001,p172.
4Robin W.Lovin,Introduction:Roberto Unger's politics,Critique and construction:a symposium on Roberto Unger's Politics,edited by Robin W.Lovin and Michael J.Perry,Cambridge; New York:Cambridge University Press,1990,p9.
5David M.Trubek,Programmatic Thought and Critique of Social Disciplines,Critique and construction:a symposium on Roberto Unger's Politics,edited by Robin W.Lovin and Michael J.Perry,Cambridge;New York:Cambridge University Press,1990,p234.
6David E.Van Zandt,Commonsense Reasoning and social change,Critique and construction:a symposium on Roberto Unger's Politics,edited by Robin W.Lovin and Michael J.Perry,Cambridge; New York:Cambridge University Press,1990,p162,p175.
7Roberto Mangabeira Unger,Social theory:its situation and its task,London:Verso,2004,p86.
8Robert W Gordon,Critical Legal Studies,in John Arthur and William H Shaw,Readings in the Philosophy of Law,3rd ed,Prentice Hall,New Jersey,2001,p203.
9Cornel West,CLS and a Liberal Critic,Yale Law Journal,April 1988,97 Yale L.J.757,cited on http://www.robertounger.com.
10John Dunn,Unger's politics and the appraisal of political possibility,Critique and construction:a symposium on Roberto Unger's Politics,edited by Robin W.Lovin and Michael J.Perry,Cambridge; New York:Cambridge University Press,1990,p71.