期刊文献+

女性搬举最大可接受重量时的劳动负荷评价 被引量:3

Work Load Evaluation of Lifting Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Females
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]研究女性手工搬举的最大可接受重量,为手工搬举作业劳动负荷标准的制定提供参考依据。[方法]用表面肌电信号技术(SEMG)和Borg量表对女性受试者搬举最大可接受重量时的劳动负荷进行评价。[结果]受试者对称搬举最大可接受重量时竖脊肌肌电幅度波动在59%~87%最大自主收缩时肌电幅度(%MVE)范围内。女性的最大可接受搬举重量远远低于根据NIOSH1991方程计算出的推荐搬举重量限值。在相同的高度,随着水平距离的增加,竖脊肌肌电幅度、RPE(Rating of Perceived Exertion)评分逐渐增加。不对称搬举最大可接受重量时不同扭转角度之间的竖脊肌肌电幅度差异无显著性,P>0.05。身体各个部位的RPE评分与扭转角度呈正相关,相关系数r>0.98,P<0.01。[结论]本次实验所搬举的重量确实为受试者的最大可接受搬举重量,NIOSH搬举方程应用于女性时应适当降低推荐搬举重量限值。 [ Objective ] To study the Maximum acceptable weight of lift ( MAWL ) in females and to provide a basis for drafting occupational health standard of manual lifting tasks. [ Methods ] Using SEMG technique and Borg CR-20 scale to evaluate the load of the Maximum acceptable weight of lift in females. [ Results ] The EMG average amplitude of the erector spinae muscles in tested subjects was in the range from 59% MVE to 87% MVE ( Maximum voluntary electrical activation ) when lifting MAWL symmetrically. The Maximum acceptable weight of lift in females was smaller than the recommended weight limit ( RWL )calculated by the revised NIOSH equation. The EMG average amplitude of the erector spinae muscles increased gradually with the horizontal distance becoming longer in the same height of lifting, so did the Rating of Perceived Exertion( RPE )Scale. The difference of EMG average amplitude was not significant in different angles of rotation when the subjects performed asymmetric lifting tasks, P 〉 0.05. RPE Scales from various parts of body had positive correlation with the angle of rotation, r 〉 0.98, P 〈 0.01. [ Conclusion ] The loads being used in this experiment are really the Maximum acceptable weight of lift in tested subjects. The lifting equation of NIOSH should include a factor of gender, and in female, the recommended weight limit should decrease accordingly.
作者 陈静 杨磊
出处 《环境与职业医学》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第1期43-45,共3页 Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
关键词 最大可接受搬举重量 表面肌电信号技术 劳动负荷 Maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) SEMG work load
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献25

  • 1杨磊.职业性下背痛的病因学研究进展[J].工业卫生与职业病,1993,19(3):190-192. 被引量:17
  • 2Melzack, R. The McGill Pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods[J]. Pain, 1975,1: 277-299.
  • 3Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire[J]. Pain, 1987, 30:191-197.
  • 4Boureau F, Luu M, Doubrere F. camlmrafive study d the validity d four French McGill Pain Quesfionnaire(MPQ)version[J] .Pain, 1992,50: 5965.
  • 5MLinton S J, Hellsing AL, Andersson D. A controlled study of the effects of an early intervention on acute musculoskeletal pain problems[J] . Pain, 1993, 54:353-359.
  • 6Marras WS, Lavender SA, Leurgans SE, et al. Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. Ergonomics, 1995,38:377-410.
  • 7Mannion AF, Dolan P. Electromyographic median frequency changes during isometric contraction of the back extensors to fatigue. Spine,1994,19:1223-1229.
  • 8Roy SH, De Luca C J, Emley M, et al. Spectral electromyographic assessment of back muscles in patients with low back pain undergoing rehabilitation. Spine, 1995,20: 38-48.
  • 9Toren A, oberg K. Maximum isometric trunk muscle strength and activity at trunk axial rotation during sitting. Appl Ergon, 1999,30:515-525.
  • 10Dolan P, Adams M. The relationship between EMG activity and extensor moment generation in the erector spinae muscles during bending and lifting activities. J Biomech, 1993,26:513-522.

共引文献33

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部