期刊文献+

新西兰无过失伤害的预防、康复和赔偿体制介绍 被引量:3

An overview of New Zealand's no fault injury prevention,rehabilitation and compensation scheme
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新西兰意外赔偿局(ACC),是管理新西兰意外事件赔偿的政府机构。ACC计划是对在新西兰境内的公民、居民或临时来访的人提供受伤赔偿的服务。每年在复原、治疗和酬劳补偿等方面要花费十几亿元,为了保证这些服务,ACC从劳动者的薪金、燃油税、政府赞助和投资收入等方面来支付赔偿金,不同行业的工伤赔偿申请比率也不同。另外,ACC建立了培训基金,代替雇主负责对员工的安全与健康培训。虽然这一体制正面临一些私有化和费用不断增加的挑战和困难,但总体来说,ACC体制是适合新西兰的一个优良的方案,比其他国家的体制在管理效率和雇主利益等方面明显显示出优势。 The Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) administers New Zealand's accident compensation scheme, which provides personal injury cover for all New Zealand citizens, residents and temporary visitors to New Zealand. In return people do not have the right to sue for personal injury, other than for exemplary damages. In New Zealand (NZ), ACC spends about $1.4 billion each year on rehabilitation, treatment and weekly compensation. To fund these services, all New Zealanders pay premiums for ACC cover. Premiums are set to pay for the current and future costs of all claims made in that year. The government funds the costs of injuries to people who are not in the paid workforce, ACC also earn income from investing the funds they hold. There are also many challenges of ACC, such as pain alone not covered at all, mental injury not covered, low level of understanding about ACC, higher costs, impact of privatization. Though the ACC system faces some challenges and difficulty, total to say, the ACC system is an excellent scheme for New Zealanders. This system displays many advantages, such as generally administratively efficient, requires less than the levies on employers of workers compensation in Australia and so on. Exactly according to above-mentioned advantage, the ACC scheme is supported by NZ's trade union movement and NZ Law Society.
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS 2007年第1期96-98,共3页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
关键词 新西兰事故赔偿计划 挑战 优秀体制 Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) challenges excellent scheme
  • 相关文献

同被引文献29

  • 1赵西巨.论知情同意法则的疆域拓展——医生对非医疗信息的告知[J].东方法学,2010(5):30-41. 被引量:7
  • 2杨立新.论医疗损害责任的归责原则及体系[J].中国政法大学学报,2009(2):62-72. 被引量:50
  • 3Craig Brown. Deterrence in Tort and NoFault: The New Zealand Experience[Z].1985.
  • 4宍戸伴久.外国的医疗事故补偿制度--新西兰和英国的情形[R].日本国立国会图书馆调查及立法察局,平成20年7月号:59-73.
  • 5Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I[J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1991,324(6):370.
  • 6薛虹.演变中的侵权责任和人身伤亡事故问题的解决[A]..民商法论丛(第5卷)[M].北京:法律出版社,1996.717.
  • 7王利明.中国民法典学者建议稿及立法理由·侵权行为编[M].北京:法律出版社,1991.264.
  • 8Craig Brown, Deterrence in Tort and No- Fault: The New Zealand Experience, 73 Calif. L. Rev. at 979 (1985).
  • 9Ken Oliphant, Beyond Misadventure: Compensation for Medical Injuries in New Zealand, 15 MEDICAL LAW REVIEW357, 359 - 62( 2007 ).
  • 10实户伴久.外国的医疗事故补偿制度一一新西兰和英国的情形[R].日本国立国会图书馆调查及立法考察局,平成20年7月号:59-73.

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部