期刊文献+

税收法规与会计标准关系模式的国际比较与有益启示 被引量:8

Two Models of Relationship between Tax Laws and Financial Accounting Rules——Comparison and Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际上,税会关系存在着截然不同的盎格鲁-撒克逊模式和欧洲大陆模式。两种模式均有悠久的历史、深厚的文化传统以及由此形成的独特会计环境。税会关系模式差异的形成,主要由各国会计环境的差别决定。对税会关系模式产生重大影响的因素主要集中在法律体系、政府对市场经济的干预程度、资本市场、资本结构和公司治理这几个方面。两种模式在税会关系模式与公平税负、税会关系模式与税务行政效率、税会关系模式与会计标准目标的实现、税会关系模式与财务欺诈以及逃税的发现与惩罚等方面有不同的效应。我国目前正处在新一轮税制改革时期,会计准则和会计制度也日渐完善并逐步与国际会计惯例接轨,充分考虑我国现有国情,吸收、借鉴国际上两大税会关系模式的经验、教训,构建中国特色的、符合未来发展方向的税会关系模式,具有理论价值与现实意义。 There are two different models of relationship between tax laws and financial accounting rules in the world: Anglo-Saxon model and Europe Continent model. Both models are long-standing in history, rich in cultural traditions and thus unique in accounting environment. The difference between the two models is mainly determined by the difference between the accounting environments. The article compares some environment factors such as law system, the degree government intervene the market, capital market and company governance, all of which play an important role in the model formation. Then the author compares four aspects of the effects of the two models: equity on tax burden, efficiency on tax administration, realization of accounting goal, detection and punishment of financial fraud and tax evasion o Currently China is undergoing tax reform and the gradual improvement of accounting norms and rules to come in line with international practice. Against such background, it is of much significance both theoretically and practically to learn from the advantages of the two models and develop our own models with Chinese characteristics.
机构地区 厦门大学财政系
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期52-57,共6页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
关键词 税收法规定 会计标准 盎格鲁-撒克逊模式 欧洲大陆模式 环境因素 Tax Laws Financial Accounting Rules Anglo-Saxon model Europe Continent model environment factoreffect
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1C.Bryan Cloyd:"The Effects of Financial Accounting Conformity on Recommendations of Tax Preparers",The Journal of the American Taxation Association,Vol.17,1995 (Fall),pg.50.
  • 2郭道扬.论两大法系的会计法律制度体系(续)[J].会计研究,2002(9):7-18. 被引量:64
  • 3Rafael La Porta,Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes,Andrei Shleifer,Robert W.Vishny:"Law and Finance",Journal of Political Economy,vol.106,No.6,1998,pp.1113-1155.
  • 4Rafael La Porta,Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes,Andrei Shleifer,Robert W.Vishny:"Legal Determinants of External Finance",Journal of Finance,vol.52,No.3,July 1997,pg.1138.
  • 5Rafael La Porta,Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes,Andrei Shleifer:"Corporate Ownership Around the World",Journal of Finance,vol.54,No.2,April 1999,pp.471-517.
  • 6David M.Maloney,Robert H.Sanborn:"Interactions Between Financial and Tax Accounting:Caused by the Tax Reform Act of 1986",Accounting Horizons,December 1988,pp.21-28.
  • 7Thomas M.Porcano,Alfred V.Tran:"Relationship of Tax and Financial Accounting Rules in Anglo-Saxon Countries",The International Journal of Accounting,Vol.33,1998,pp.433-454.
  • 8Gary A Mc Gill,Edmund Outslay:"Lost in Translation:Detecting Tax Shelter Activity in Financial Statements",National Tax Journal,Sep 2004,Vol.57,pp.739-756.
  • 9David Lenter,Joel Slemrod,Douglas Shackelford:"Public Disclosure of Corporate Tax Return Information:Accounting,Economics,and Legal Perspectives",National Tax Journal,Vol.56,Dec 2003,pg.803.
  • 10Blake John,Akerfeldt Katarina,Fortes Hilary J,Gowthorpe Catherine:"The relationship between tax and accounting rules the Swedish case",European Business Review,Vol.97,1997,pg.85.

二级参考文献12

  • 1郭道扬.英美的注册会计师制度(下)[J].当代财经,1995(8):44-51. 被引量:1
  • 2何勤华.美国法律发展史[M].上海人民出版社,1998.
  • 3艾伦·沃森·李静冰,等译.1992.民法法系的演变及形成.中国政法大学出版社.
  • 4伯纳德·施瓦茨.1997.美国法律史.牛日政法大学出版社.
  • 5哈曼得·德姆塞茨,段毅才,等译.1999.所有权控制与企业—论经济活动的组织.经济科学出版社.
  • 6何勤华.1999.德国法律发展史.法律出版社
  • 7曼宁.1962.股东的估损.耶鲁大学法律评论,72
  • 8吴志忠.1997.美国高等法研究.武汉大学出版社.
  • 9斯韦托扎尔·平乔维其.1999.产权经济学—一种关于比较体制的理论.经济科学出版社.
  • 10C.A.莫耶.美国审计的早期发展[J].会计评论,1951,26.

共引文献66

同被引文献59

引证文献8

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部