期刊文献+

股东套利行为与企业融资方式选择 被引量:6

Shareholder's Arbitrage Behaviors and Firm's Choices On Financing Mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股东的出资行为对企业融资方式的选择具有决定性作用。对于正常经营的企业,为了发挥债务资本的税蔽效应和杠杆作用,股东往往愿意企业负债经营,但是负债的对象不一定是普通债权人,很可能是股东自身;对于陷入财务危机的企业,为套牢普通债权人获得更多的企业重组收益,股东也愿意“自我负债”融资。通过债务性资本与替权益性资本的替换,股东总能够获得套利收益,但同时也损害了普通债权人和政府的收益,因而受到法律的限制。然而,在现实经济中股东的套利空间仍然存在,并对企业的融资方式选择,尤其是对债务资本产生了深远的影响。 Shareholders' capital offering behaviors have decisive influence on firm's financing model. For those normally runed firms, shareholders are willing to take more debts to take the advantages of leverage and tax shield effect from debt financing, while the shareholders may not borrow from the ordinary debtees but from themselves. And for the firms suffered from financial distress, shareholders still prefer "self-lending" to other debts, thus tacking ordinary debtees and making them accept reorganization arrangement. Shareholders can always seize private interest by substituting debet -- offering for equity--offering, but such substitution harms ordinary debtees and government' s interest and was banned by law. However, in the reality there are still lots of such arbitrage opportunities, which exert far-reaching impacts on firms financing models, especially on debts.
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期32-37,共6页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
关键词 套利机会 股东行为 融资方式 重组与清算 Arbitrage opportunity Shareholders ' behaviors Financing mode Reorganization & liquidation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1罗伯特·霍恩.德国民商法导论(中译本)[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.
  • 2王利明.公司的有限责任制度的若干问题(下)[J].政法论坛,1994,12(3):87-93. 被引量:71
  • 3Carlos L.Israels,The Implications and Limitations of the "Deep Rock" Doctrine[J].Columbia Law Review,Vol.42,No.3,March.1942,pp.376-394.
  • 4E.J.Cohn; C.Simitis,"Lifting the Veil" in the Company Laws of the European Continent[J].The International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.12,No.1,January 1963,pp.189-225.
  • 5Elazar Berkovitch,Ronen Israel,The Design of Internal Control and Capital Structure[J].The Review of Financial Studies,Vol.9,N0.1,Spring 1996,pp.209-240.
  • 6Harry G.Henn,Law of Corporations[M].2nd ed.West Publishing Co.1970.
  • 7Jeffrey Stephen Turner,Should Tender Offer Arbitrage Be Regulated?[J].Duke Law Journal,Vol.1978,No.4,October 1978,pp.1000-1040.
  • 8Juan M.Dobson,"Lifting the Veil" in Four Countries:The Law of Argentina,England,France and the United States[J].The International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.35,No.4,October 1986,pp.839-863.
  • 9Mark J.Roe,Bankruptcy and Debt:A New Model for Corporate Reorganization[J].Columbia Law Review,Vo.83,No.3,April 1983,pp.527-602.
  • 10Michael J.Brennan,Eduardo S.Schwartz,Regulation and Corporate Investment Policy[J].The Journal of Finance,Vol.37,No.2,May 1982,pp.289-300.

共引文献70

同被引文献76

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部