期刊文献+

加替沙星7日疗法治疗43例急性尿路感染的临床评价 被引量:3

Clinical evaluation of gatifloxacin treatment for 7 days in 43 patients with acute urinary tract infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价加替沙星治疗急性尿路感染的有效性和安全性。方法:将86例临床确诊为急性尿路感染的患者随机分为2组:试验组(加替沙星组)43例,口服加替沙星胶囊400 mg,1次/d;对照组(头孢克洛组)43例,口服头孢克洛胶囊250 mg,3次/d,疗程均为1周。结果:试验组与对照组总有效率分别为95.3%和93.0%。细菌清除率分别为94.6%和88.6%。药物不良反应发生率分别为7.0%和9.3%。结论:加替沙星7日疗法是治疗急性尿路感染安全、有效的临床治疗方法之一。 Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gatifloxacin compared with cefaclor in the treatment of acute urinary tract infection. Methods: Eighty-six patients with acute urinary tract infection were randomized into gatifloxacin group (GAT, 400 mg,po,qd) and cefaclor group (CEF, 250 mg,po,tid ). Each group had 43 patients. The therapy lasted 7 days. Results: The overall clinical effective rates of GAT and CEF groups were 95.3% and 93.0%, respectively. The bacteria clearance rates of two groups were 94.6% and 88.6%, and the incidences of adverse drug reactions were 7.0% and 9.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Gatifloxacin treatment for 7 days is one of the safe and effective methods for treating acute urinary tract infection.
出处 《药学服务与研究》 CAS CSCD 2007年第1期61-63,共3页 Pharmaceutical Care and Research
关键词 加替沙星 药物评价 急性尿路感染 头孢克洛 gatifloxacin drug evaluation acute urinary tract infection cefaclor
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1Lode H. Evidence of different profiles of side effects and drug-drug interactions among the quinolones the pharmacokinetic standpoint[J]Chemotherapy. 2001,47 Suppl 3:24~31; discussion 44~48.
  • 2Fuhr U,Anders EM,Mahr G,et al.Inhibitory potency of quinolone antibacterial agents against cytochrome P450IA2 activity in vivo and vitro.Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1992,36:942~948.
  • 3Tanaka M, Otsuki M, Une T, et al. In - vitro and in - vivo activity of DR - 3355, an optically active isomer of ofloxacin [ J ]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1990 ;26: 659 - 666.
  • 4Wakabayashi E, Mitsuhashi S. In vitro activity of AM - 1155, a novel 6- fluoro - 8 methoxy quinolone [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1994 ;38: 594 - 601.
  • 5Bauernfeind A. Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12- 8039, gatifloxacin (AM1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin[ J]. J Antimicrob Chenother, 1997;40: 639 - 651.
  • 6Haria M, Lamb HM. Trovafloxacin[J]. Drugs, 1997; 54:435 -445.
  • 7Woodcock JM, Andrews JM, Boswell FJ. et al. In vitro activity of Bay 12 - 8039, a new fluoroquinolone [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1997 ;41: 101 - 106.
  • 8Sato K, Hoshino K, Tanaka M, et al. Antimicrobial activity of DU -6859, a new potent fluoroquinolone, against clinical isolates[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1992 ;36: 1491 - 1498.
  • 9Brouwers JR. Drug interactions with quinolone antibacterials [ J ].Drug Saf, 1992 ;7: 268 - 281.
  • 10Douidar SM, Snodgrass WR. Potential role of fluoroquinolones in pediatric infections[J]. Rev Infect Dis,1989;11: 878 -889.

共引文献38

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部