摘要
法律推理既具有逻辑特性又具有法学特性,所以法律推理的有效性也应当分别通过逻辑视角与法学精神进行论证。判例主义法律推理融类比推理、归纳推理与演绎推理为一体,具有良好的自我检验功能。归纳推理在判例主义法律推理中占有重要地位,虽然归纳推理在逻辑上仅仅具有相对的有效性即具有“归纳问题”,但在“归纳原理”的作用下至少能够保证推理结论的“概率真理性”。
Legal reasoning of case law integrates analogy reasoning, inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning and has a favorable self - testing function. Inductive reasoning plays an important role in legal reasoning of case - law, although it only has the relative validity in logic, which means that in spite of its ＂inductive blemish＂, the liable correct conclusion can be arrived at with the work of inductive principles.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期40-48,共9页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
法律推理
归纳推理
法律适用
有效性
法律论证
legal reasoning
inductive reasoning
analogy reasoning
legal application
validity
legal argumentation
