期刊文献+

Weekly gemcitabine as a radiosensitiser for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer:phase Ⅰ trial 被引量:5

Weekly gemcitabine as a radiosensitiser for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer:phase Ⅰ trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Conventional treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BM) is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The efficacy is limited. It might be increased by a potent radiosensitizer such as gemcitabine, which is believed to cross the disrupted blood-brain barrier. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine given concurrently with WBRT. Methods Patients with BM from NSCLC were included. The dose of WBRT was 3750 cGy (total 15 times, 3 weeks). Gemcitabine was given concurrently with WBRT on days 1, 8 and 15. The starting dose was 400 mg/m^2, escalated by 100 mg/m^2 increments. At least three patients were included per level. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological or grade 2 neurological toxicity. When two or more patients experience DLT, the MTD was reached. Results A total of 16 patients were included; 69% had a performance status (PS) 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG). A total of 69% had concurrent active extra cranial diseases. All had more than 3 BM. Up to 600 mg/m^2 (level 3) no neurology toxicity was observed. At 600 mg/m^2 two out of 9 patients developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. One of the two patients' thrombocytopenia was confused with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). At 700 mg/m^2 two out of 4 patients developed neurotoxicities. One developed grade 3 seizure and cognitive disorder. Another patient developed suspected grade 2 muscle weakness. Conclusions The MTD was reached at a dose of 700 mg/m^2. The dose of 600 mg/m^2 would be considered for further study. Background Conventional treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BM) is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The efficacy is limited. It might be increased by a potent radiosensitizer such as gemcitabine, which is believed to cross the disrupted blood-brain barrier. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine given concurrently with WBRT. Methods Patients with BM from NSCLC were included. The dose of WBRT was 3750 cGy (total 15 times, 3 weeks). Gemcitabine was given concurrently with WBRT on days 1, 8 and 15. The starting dose was 400 mg/m^2, escalated by 100 mg/m^2 increments. At least three patients were included per level. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological or grade 2 neurological toxicity. When two or more patients experience DLT, the MTD was reached. Results A total of 16 patients were included; 69% had a performance status (PS) 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG). A total of 69% had concurrent active extra cranial diseases. All had more than 3 BM. Up to 600 mg/m^2 (level 3) no neurology toxicity was observed. At 600 mg/m^2 two out of 9 patients developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. One of the two patients' thrombocytopenia was confused with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). At 700 mg/m^2 two out of 4 patients developed neurotoxicities. One developed grade 3 seizure and cognitive disorder. Another patient developed suspected grade 2 muscle weakness. Conclusions The MTD was reached at a dose of 700 mg/m^2. The dose of 600 mg/m^2 would be considered for further study.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2007年第6期458-462,共5页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
基金 This study was supported by the China Society of Clinical Oncology Foundation(No.Y-2005-0010)
关键词 brain metastases radiosensitisation GEMCITABINE phase I study brain metastases radiosensitisation gemcitabine phase I study
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Dwaine F Emerich,Reginald L Dean,JoAnne Marsh,Melissa Pink,Denise Lafreniere,Pamela Snodgrass,Raymond T Bartus.Intravenous Cereport (RMP-7) Enhances Delivery of Hydrophilic Chemotherapeutics and Increases Survival in Rats with Metastatic Tumors in the Brain[J].Pharmaceutical Research.2000(10)
  • 2Wen PY,McLaren Black R,Loeffler JS.Metastatic brain cancer[].Cancer:principles and practice of oncology.1999
  • 3Ceresoli GL,Reni M,Chiesa C,et al.Brain metastases in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer after multimodality treatment: risk factors analysis[].Cancer.2002
  • 4Lagerwaard,FJ,Levendag,PC,Nowak,PJ,Eijkenboom,WM,Hanssens,PE,Schmitz,PI.Identification of prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases: a review of 1292 patients[].International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics.1999
  • 5Shahidi H,Kvale PA.Long-term survival following surgical treatment of solitary brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer[].Chest.1996
  • 6van,Vulpen,M,Kal,HB,Taphoorn,MJ,El-Sharouni,SY.Changes in blood–brain barrier permeability induced by radiotherapy: implications for timing of chemotherapy? (Review)[].Oncology Reports.2002
  • 7Crino,L,Scagliotti,GV,Ricci,S,De,Marinis,G,Rinaldi,M,Gridelli,C,Ceribelli,A,Bianco,R,Marangolo,M,Di,Costanzo,F,Sassi,M,Barni,S,Ravaioli,A,Adamo,V,Portalone,L,Cruciani,G,Masotti,A,Ferrara,G,Gozzelino,F,Tonato,M.Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Italian Lung Cancer Project[].Journal of Clinical Oncology.1999
  • 8Luca Moscetti,Fabrizio Nelli,et al.Up-front chemother- apy and radiation treatment in newly diagnosed nonsmall cell lung cancer with brain metastases[].Cancer.2007
  • 9Kim DY,Lee KW,Yun T, et al.Efficacy of platinum-bases chemotherapy after cranial radiation in patients with brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer[].Oncology Reports.2005
  • 10Folstein MF,Folstein SE,McHugh PR."Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician[].Journal of Psychiatric Research.1975

同被引文献9

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部