期刊文献+

退耕还林的经济学理论基础:基于外在性和公共品理论的考察 被引量:1

The Economics Logic of the Sloping Land Conversion Program: From Externality Theory and Public Good Theory to Principal-agent Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文将退耕还林工程纳入主流经济学框架中进行分析,对其经济学理论基础进行评价,并揭示其内在的经济学逻辑。首先,在外在性理论框架中讨论开征庇古税的局限性,借用科斯定理自愿的市场交易方式也难以达到退耕还林及水土保持的效果。其次,通过建立一个公共品供给博弈模型阐明了退耕还林由城市居民承担成本的原因,并借用最优税收理论阐明这一理论所导致的政策的社会成本高昂,作为一种替代机制的委托—代理成为节约社会成本的方式。最后,提出了若干政策建议。 With a huge budget, the sloping land conversion program(SLCP)has profound significance in china. We evaluate the economics theoretical basis of SLCP and reveal the internal economics logic of SLCP in a framework of mainstream economics. Firstly, we discuss the limitation of beginning to collect Pigou taxes in the framework of externality theory and point out that it is difficult to achieve good results of sloping land conversion through voluntary transaction of Coase theorem. Secondly, we illustrate the reasons of urban residents paying a price of SLCP through a game model of public goods, and by using of optimal tax theory we analyze that the policy of the theory will lead to a high social cost. As a substitution mechanism, the principalagent of SLCP is a way of cutting down the social cost. Lastly, we put forward some proposals of public policy.
作者 雷震 王素玲
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期28-31,共4页 Ecological Economy
关键词 退耕还林 外在性 公共品 委托-代理 SLCP externality public goods principal-agent
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1徐晋涛,陶然,徐志刚.退耕还林:成本有效性、结构调整效应与经济可持续性——基于西部三省农户调查的实证分析[J].经济学(季刊),2004,4(1):139-162. 被引量:226
  • 2国家林业局制定的.《退耕还林工程规划》[Z].,..
  • 3卢锋.《三次粮食过剩(1984-1998)——我国粮食流通政策演变过程的备择解释》[J].《经济工作者学习资料》,1999,(60).
  • 4蒋高明.《重建设轻保护,生态建设不等于造林》[N].《中国青年报》,2003年9月24日.
  • 5Uchida, Emi, Jintao Xu and Scott Rozeile, "Grain for Green" Policy in China: Cost-effectiveness and Sustainability of a Conservation Set-aside Program. Paper Presented at AAEA 2003 Annual Conference, 20030.
  • 6Liu Mingxing and Tao Ran, Regional Competition, Fiscal Reform and Local Governance in China. Paper Prepared forthe Conference "Paying for Progress. Public finance, Human Welfare, and Inequality in China". Oxford: Institute for Chinese Studies, May 21--23, 2004.
  • 7Cooper, J. C., and T. Osborn, "The Effect of Rental Rates on the Extension of Conservation Reserve Program Contracts", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998, 80, 184-194.
  • 8Huang, J., "Land Degradation in China: Erosion and Salinity Component", CCAP Working Paper,WP-00-E17, Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Beijing, China, 2000.
  • 9Johnson, P. N., S. K. Misra, and R. T. Ervin, "A Qualitative Choice Analysis of Factors Influencing PostCRP Land Use Decisions", Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 1997, 29 (1),163-173.
  • 10Just, R., and J. Antle, "Interactions between Agricultural and Environmental Policies: Aconceptual Framework", American Economic Review, 1990, 80, 197-202.

共引文献363

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部