摘要
目的比较针刺结合龙氏手法与单纯针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病的镇痛作用。方法按随机对照方法,治疗组采用龙氏手法结合针刺,对照组采用单纯针刺方法。通过观察简化McGill疼痛问卷及疗效标准以评定疗效。结果治疗组总有效率为97.23%,对照组为90.91%,疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但在VAS、PPI、PRI上,治疗组均优于对照组。结论龙氏手法结合针刺更有利于神经根型颈椎病的止痛。
Objective To compare the analgesic effect of acupuncture plus Long＇ s manipulation with simple acupuncture on nerve root-type cervical spondylopathy. Methods According to a randomized control method, a treatment group received acupuncture plus Long＇s manipulation and a control group, simple acupuncture. The curative effects were evaluated by modified McGill pain questionnaire and criteria of curative effects, Results The total efficacy rate was 97, 23% in the treatment group and 90, 91% in the control group ; there was no significant difference in curative effect （P〉 0.05 ）, but VAS, PPI and PRI were all better in the treatment group than in the control group, Conclusion Acupuncture plus Long＇ s manipulation has a better analgesic effect on nerve root-type cervical spondylopathy.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2007年第3期12-14,共3页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
针刺
推拿
正骨手法
颈椎病
镇痛
Acupuncture
Massotherapy
Orthopaedic manipulation
Cervical spondylopathy
Analgesia
