期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

我国公务员绩效评估公平性结构的实证研究 被引量：3

An Empirical Study on the Justice Construct Structure of Civil Servants' Performance Appraisal in Local Governments of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本论文以833名公务员为对象,通过构建公务员绩效评估公平性问卷,对公务员绩效评估公平性的结构进行了探讨。探索性因素分析表明,公务员绩效评估公平性的结构主要包括评估系统公平、评估者公平、信息公平和人际公平等四个维度;验证性因素分析表明问卷,具有较好的构思效度和建构信度,其问卷可以作为测量公务员绩效评估公平性的工具。 With the survey of 833 civil servants from several local government departments, we explored the justice construct structure of civil servants＇ performance appraisal. Both the EFA and CFA showed that the justice construct structure of civil servants＇ performance appraisal consisted of four dimensions： system justice, rater justice, information justice and interpersonal justice. The scale, with good construct validity and reliability, can be used as a framework and tool to measure the justice of civil servants＇ nerformance appraisal.
作者 王重鸣 徐小军
机构地区 浙江大学管理学院 浙江大学心理与行为科学院
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期277-280,271,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(70232010) 国家教育部博士点基金项目资助(20060335127) 浙江大学强所计划重点项目支持。
关键词 公务员 绩效评估 公平性 构思效度 建构效度 civil servants, performance appraisal, justice, construct validity, construct reliability
分类号 B849 [哲学宗教—应用心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Landy,F.J.,& Farr,J.L.Performance rating.Psychological Bulletin,1980,87:72-107
  • 2Jacobs,R.,Kafry,D.,& Zedeck,S.Expectations of behaviorally anchored rating scales.Personnel Psychology,1980,33:595-640
  • 3Folger,R.,& Konovsky,M.A.Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.Academy of Management Journal,1989,32:115-130
  • 4Konovsky,M.A.,& Cropanzano,R.Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,1991,76:698-707
  • 5Moorman,R.H.Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors:do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology,1991,76:845-855
  • 6Cawley,B.D.etal.Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions:a meta analytic review of field investigations.Journal of Applied Psychology,1998,83:615-633
  • 7Cropanzano,R.,& Folger,R.Procedural justice and worker motivation.In:R.M.Steers,L.W.Porter (Eds.).Motivation and work behavior (5th ed.).New York:McGraw-Hill,1991:131-143
  • 8Bies,R.J.,& Moag,J.S.International justice:communication criteria of fairness.Research on Negotiation in Organizations,1986,1:43-55
  • 9Masterson,S.S.,et al.Integrating justice and social exchange:the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships.Academy of Management Journal,2000,43:738-748
  • 10Erdogan,B.,et al.Procedural justice as a two-dimensional construct:an examination in the performance appraisal context.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,2001,37:205-222

共引文献93

同被引文献28

  • 1姜晓萍,马凯利.我国公务员绩效考核的困境及其对策分析[J].社会科学研究,2005(1):1-5. 被引量：94
  • 2Konovsky M A, Cropanzano R. Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991,76:698 -707
  • 3Moorman R H. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors:Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991,76:845 - 855
  • 4Cawley B D, et al. Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions : a meta analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998,83:615 - 633
  • 5Erdogan B. Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review ,2002,12:555 - 578
  • 6Berger M A. Research corporate culture : The agony and tidecstasy. In : Glidewell J C, ed. Alexandria, VA : American Society for Training and Development, 1996
  • 7Judge T A, et al. The core self-evaluations scale:Development of a measure, Personnel Psychology 2003,56 (2) :303 - 311
  • 8Masterson S S, et al. Integrating justice and social exchange:the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal ,2000,43:738 - 748
  • 9李秀娟,魏峰.组织公正和交易型领导对组织承诺的影响方式研究[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(5):82-88. 被引量：24
  • 10王重鸣,徐小军.我国公务员绩效评估公平性的影响因素研究[J].应用心理学,2007,13(2):115-118. 被引量：3

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

心理科学
2007年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部