摘要
目的了解本院临床分离的葡萄球菌对克林霉素诱导型耐药的发生率,帮助临床医师正确选择药物。方法采用K-B纸片琼脂扩散法检测葡萄球菌对红霉素和克林霉素的耐药性,按照CLSI/NCCLS推荐的D-试验方法检测克林霉素诱导型耐药。结果133株受试葡萄球菌对红霉素和克林霉素耐药菌株数分别为66株(49.6%)和43株(33.3%),66株耐红霉素葡萄球菌中有20株(其中金黄色葡萄球菌10株、表皮葡萄球菌9株、腐生葡萄球菌1株)为克林霉素诱导型耐药株,占红霉素耐药株的30.3%。在红霉素耐药金黄色葡萄球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌中,克林霉素诱导型耐药的检出率分别达38.5%和25.0%。对红霉素和克林霉素同时敏感或克林霉素耐药株中,未检到克林霉素诱导型耐药株。结论对红霉素耐药而克林霉素敏感的葡萄球菌应进行D-试验,报道克林霉素诱导耐药性结果,以便临床正确选择药物。
Objective To investigate the probability of induction of clindmycin resistance in isolates of Staphylococcus from clinical lab and to help clinical physicians to select appropriate therapy decision. Methods K-B disk diffusion method was used to test erythromycin or clindamycin resistance in isolates of Staphylococcus, D-test recommended by CLSI/NCCLS was used to examine the inducible resistance of erythromycin to clindamycin. Results Erythromycin-resistant isolates and clindamycinresistant isolates accounted for 66 strain (49.6%) and 43 strain (33. 3%) in 133 tested isolates of Staphylococcus respectively. There were 20 inducible clindamycin-resistant isolates (including 10 isolates of S. aureus, 9 isolates of S. epidermidis and 1 isolate of S. saprophyticus. ) whose rate was 30.3% among the 66 erythromycin-resistant isolates. The rate of inducible resistance to clindamycin was 38.5 %0 and 25.0 % in erythromycin-resistant isolates of S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus respectively. There was no induction of clindamycin resistance in isolates which possessed both erythromycin and clindamycin sensitive or clindamycin resistant. Conclusion Erythromycin-resistant and clindamycin-sensitive isolates should be checked by D-test in clinical lab so as to offer physicians correct antimicrobial agents information.
出处
《国际检验医学杂志》
CAS
2007年第3期206-208,共3页
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词
葡萄球菌属
红霉素
克林霉素
抗药性
微生物
Staphylococcus
Erythromycin
Clindamycin
Drug resistance,microbial