财政分权与经济增长:第二代财政分权理论被引量：17

Fiscal Decentralization and Growth:Second Generation Theory of Fiscal Decentralization

导出

摘要 20世纪90年代中期以来,第二代财政分权理论有了极大发展。本文回顾了这一新理论区别于传统理论的特征,以及将其用于经济增长研究得出的新发现和主要问题。在此类研究中,中国改革开放以来的经济绩效,一方面为回答“财政分权是否有助于促进经济增长”提供了重要的经验研究依据,另一方面也在一定程度上证实了制度设计对财政分权效果具有决定性影响的判断,这与国内一些研究得出的结论有相似之处。这些研究成果对我国未来的中央—地方财政关系的发展具有重要的启示意义。 Since the mid-1990s,the “second-generation theory of fiscal decentralization' has made great strides.This paper examines the background for this “second-generation',in particular,the characteristics that differentiate it from the “first generation,' its major conclusions,and the problems that emerge in applying it to the study of the relationship between fiscal decentralization and growth.China plays an important role in studies of this kind.On the one hand,China's economic performance in the last 28 years provides basic empirical evidence for answering the question:“Does decentralization promote economic growth?' On the other hand,what happened in China lends support to the view that institutional design is crucial for determining the outcome of fiscal decentralization.As such,these kinds of studies should be useful for understanding the future of reforms involving centralization and decentralization.

作者刘晓路

机构地区中国人民大学财政金融学院财政系

出处《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期47-53,共7页 Finance & Trade Economics

关键词财政分权经济增长制度设计 Fiscal Decentralization,Economic Growth,Institutional Design

分类号 F810 [经济管理—财政学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献56

1Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter, Endogenous Growth Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998.
2Akai, N., Y. Nishimura, and M. Sakata, Fiscal decentralization, economic growth and economic volatility - Theory and evidence from state-level cross-scction data for the United States. Discussion Paper Series 03-F-2, The Center for International Trade Studies, Yokohama National University, 2004.
3Arzaghi, Mohammad and Henderson, J. Vernon, Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 89(7), July, 2005, pp. 1157-1189.
4Arrow, K., The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Non-Market Allocation. In Joint Economic Committee, The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPBSystem, Vol. Ⅰ. Washington, D.C. : U.S. GPO, 1970.
5Barro, R., Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1990, pp. 108 - 125.
6Behnisch, A., T. Buettner and D. Stegarescu, Public Sector Centralization and Productivity Growth : A long-term View on the German Experience. Conference paper, 57 th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance (IIPF), A-Linz, August 27 - 30, 2001.
7Blanchard, Olivler J. and Shleifer, Andrei, Federalism With and Without Political Centralization: China Versus Russia. IMF STAFF PAPERS, 48, 2001, pp. 171 - 179, Sp. Iss. SI.
8Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan, The Power to Tax : Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1980.
9Davoodi, H. and H. Zou, Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 1998,pp. 244 - 257.
10Desai, R. M., L. M. Freinkman and I. Goldberg, Fiscal Federalism and Regional Growth, Evidence from the Russian Federation in the 1990s. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. 3138, 2003.