期刊文献+

隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告 被引量:174

The Concepts,Design,Practice and Reports of Allocation Concealment and Blinding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “分配隐藏”很容易被误解而被广大临床试验实施者和论文作者所忽略,尤其是常将“分配隐藏”与盲法混淆。分配隐藏实质是产生随机序列者和决定分配序别者不能参与纳入受试者,也不宜参与以后的试验过程,尤其不能参与结果的测量。本文通过实例介绍了正确的分配隐藏和盲法实施过程。最后,还举例介绍了论文写作中方法学的描述。 The original meaning of "allocation concealment" is that the statistician and the trial designer who generated the random sequence and allocation sequence should not recruit and allocate the participants for the purpose of avoiding selection bias. In the process of generating allocation sequence, combined blinding measures are so called "settingblinding" , for instance, by using "double simulation" . We use a example to describe how to perform an adequate allocation and conceal the sequence, and setting blinding. Another example is used to describe how to report the methods of randomization, allocation concealment and the effect of blinding, etc.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2007年第3期222-225,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 隐蔽分组(分配隐藏) 盲法 实施 报告 Allocation concealment Blinding Practice Report
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Jadad AR. Randomised controlled trials, A user's guide.[2007-01-26]http://www.cgmh.org.tw/intr/intr5/c6700/OBGYN/F/Randomized%20tial/chapter I .html.
  • 2Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, et al. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med, 1983, 309:1359-1361.
  • 3Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias:dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA, 1995, 273: 408-412.
  • 4Schulz KF. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA,1995, 274: 1456-1458.
  • 5Pildal J, Chan AW, Hrebjartsson A, et al. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BM./, 2005, 330: 1049.
  • 6Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, et al. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet, 1996, 347:363-366.

同被引文献2469

引证文献174

二级引证文献1507

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部