期刊文献+

椎间盘源性腰痛的临床特点与治疗 被引量:35

Clinical characteristics and treatment of discogenic low back pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨椎间盘源性腰痛的临床表现特点,为其诊断和治疗提供参考。方法:回顾性分析经手术治疗的21例椎间盘源性腰痛患者的术前临床表现、影像学资料及术后腰痛和功能改善程度。结果:椎间盘源性腰痛的主要临床表现为伴有功能障碍的严重腰痛,可伴随腹股沟、大腿前外侧痛或根性放射痛;病变椎间盘造影纤维环破裂明显,MRI上出现椎间盘纤维环后方高信号或终板信号改变者比率低;前路椎间盘切除、椎间融合术后疼痛VAS评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数改善率分别为(82.2±3.4)%和(74.0±5.7)%。结论:椎间盘源性腰痛患者的特异性体征和影像表现少,椎间盘造影是可靠诊断方法,前路椎间盘切除椎间融合疗效可靠。 Objective:To review the clinical characteristic of discogenic low back pain which guide to the diagnose and treatment.Method:Twenty-one patients with discogenic low back pain were peformed with anterior discectomy and intervertebral fusion.The clinical presentation and radiographic materials of these patients were studied retrospectively.The pain relief and functional improvement was assessed with visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index.All patients were followed up for 8 months to 9 years(average 3.1 years). Result:The clinical manifestations of discogenic low back pain is serious low back pain with significant dysfunction.The radiating pain and the referred pain in groin skins and low extremities were often presented without the nerve root compressed.The high-intensity-zone and the Modie change on the MRI can't be replaced for discography for their low sensitivity.Effective pain relief and functional improvement has been obtained by the intervertebral fusion and the improved rate is (82.2±3.4)% and (74.0±5.7)% respectively.Conclusion:The discography is the gold criterion for the diagnosis of the discogenic low back pain.The patient can be treated effectively by anterior discectomy and intervertebral fusion.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 2007年第3期177-181,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 椎间盘源性腰痛 临床特点 诊断 治疗 Discogenic low back pain Clinical characteristic Diagnosis Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1McKenna PJ,Freeman BJ,Mulholland RC,et al.A prospective,randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2-year clinical results[J].Eur Spine J,2005,14(8):727-737.
  • 2李危石,陈仲强,郭昭庆,齐强,刘忠军.椎间植骨融合与横突间植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症的比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(1):20-23. 被引量:113
  • 3Jones A,Clarke A,Freeman BJ,et al.The Modic classification:inter-and intraobserver error in clinical practice[J].Spine,2005,15,30(16):1867-1869.
  • 4Mitra D,Cassar-Pullicino VN,McCall IW.Longitudinal study of high intensity zones on MR of lumbar intervertebral discs[J].Clin Radiol,2004,59(11):1002-1008.
  • 5Freemont AJ,Watkins A,Le Maitre C,et al.Nerve growth fac tor expression and innervation of the painful intervertebral disc[J].J Pathol,2002,197 (3):286-292.
  • 6Burke JG,Watson RWG,McCormack D,et al.Human nucleus pulposus can respond to a pro-inflammatory stimulus[J].Spine,2003,28 (24):2685-2693.
  • 7Mendez R,Bailey S,Paine G,et al.Evaluation of the L2 spinal nerve root infiltration as a diagnostic tool for discogenic low back pain[J].Pain Physician,2005,8(1):55-59.
  • 8彭宝淦,侯树勋,吴闻文,李振宙.化学性神经根炎[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):223-227. 被引量:30
  • 9Shav RV,Everett CR,Mcknezie-Brown AM,et al.Discography as a diagnostic test for spinal pain:a systematic and narrative review[J].Pain Physician,2005,8(2):187-209.
  • 10Lam KS,Carlin D,Mulholland RC.Lumbar disc high-intensity zone:the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source[J].Eur Spine J,2000,9(1):36-41.

二级参考文献30

  • 1彭宝淦.椎间盘源性下腰痛[J].国外医学(骨科学分册),2005,26(6):323-325. 被引量:6
  • 2Lin PM. Posterior lumbar interbodv fusion technique,compli-cations and pitfalls[J].Clin Orthop,1985,193 :90-102.
  • 3Verlooy J, De Smedt K,Selosse P.Failme of a modified poste-rior lumbar interbody fusion technique to produce adequate pain relief in isthmie spondylolytie grade 1 spondylolisthesis patients[J].Spine, 1993,18(11) : 1491-1495.
  • 4Suk S,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al. Adding posterior lumbar inter-bodv fusion to pediele screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spnndylolisthesis [J].Spine, 1997,22 (2) : 210-220.
  • 5Schlegel KF,Pon A,Biomechanics of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis[J].Clin Orthop, 1985,193:115-119.
  • 6Madan S, Boeree NR.Outcome of posterior interbodv fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spond?,lolytie spondylolisthesis[J].Spine, 2002,27 ( 14 ) : 1536-1542.
  • 7Nork SE,Hu SS,Workrnan KI,et al. Patient outcome after de-compression and instrumented posterior spinal Iusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Spine. 1999,24(6) :561-569.
  • 8Kim NH,Lee JW.Anterior interbody Iusion versus posterolater-al fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic, spondylnlis-thesis in adults[J].Spine. 1999,24(8) :812-817.
  • 9Booth KC,Bridwell KH,Eisenberg BA,et al. Mininmm 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decnm-pression and instrumented posterior fusion [J].Spine, 1999,24(16) : 1721-1727.
  • 10Takebayashi T,Cavanaugh JM,Ozaktay AC,et al.Effect of nucleus pulposus on the neural activity of dorsal root ganglion.Spine,2001,26:940-945.

共引文献141

同被引文献345

引证文献35

二级引证文献328

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部