期刊文献+

标准HLA配型与氨基酸残基配型在再次肾移植中的应用 被引量:1

HLA and HLA Amino Acid Residue Matching In Kidney Retransplantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨人类白细胞抗原(HLA)配型(Ag M)和氨基酸残基配型(Res M)标准在再次肾移植受者中的应用。【方法】回顾性分析HLA配型、Res M及基因水平HLA-DR相容对78例再次肾移植患者早期肾功能、早期排斥反应及人/肾存活率的影响。【结果】应用Res M标准,0MM受者由AgM组2.6%提高到ResM组14.1%(P=0.0027),0~1MM组受者由Ag M组15.4%提高到ResM组52.6%(P<0.001);残基相配组与残基错配组相比,DR相配组与DR错配组相比:早期移植肾功能恢复快、早期排斥反应发生率显著减少,1、3年移植肾存活率明显提高(P<0.05)。【结论】HLA-Res M可大幅度增加供受者的相配概率,显著降低术后早期排斥反应发生率,适合在再次肾移植患者中应用。基因水平HLA-DR相容对再次肾移植术后早期排斥反应和存活率具有重要影响。 [Objective] To explore the applied value of HLA six-antigen match program (Ag M) and HLA amino acid residue matching (Res M) for recipients undergoing kidney retransplantation. [Methods] The influence of HLA matching, Res M, genomic HLA-DR compatibility on early renal function, early rejection episodes, and recipient/regraft survival rate were retrospectively analyzed in 78 cases of recipients undergoing kidney retransplantation. [Results] The rate of Res- matched transplants greatly increased. The rate of 0 mismatch (MM) recipients increased from 2.6% by Ag M to 14.1% by Res M, and that of 0-1 MM transplants from 15.4% to 52.6%. Early graft function, early rejection episodes and graft survival in well-matched recipients were better than those in poorly-matched patients. [Conclusions] The Res M can greatly increase the rate of Res-matched transplants, minimize the rate of early rejection episodes and be suitable to the clinical application for recipients undergoing kidney retransplantation. G enomic compatibility of HLA-DR has effect on early rejection episodes and regraft survival in kidney retransplantation.
出处 《中山大学学报(医学科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期196-200,204,共6页 Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University:Medical Sciences
基金 广东省科委攻关基金资助项目(092019) 广东省科技计划项目资助(B30201)
关键词 肾移植 再手术 组织相容性 HLA-DR抗原 kidney transplantation reoperation histocompatibility HLA-DR antigens
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1THOMPSON J S,THACKER L R 2nd,KRISHNAN G.Human leukocyte antigens DR and AB and kidney retransplantation[J].Transplantation,2003,75(5):718-723.
  • 2TAKEMOTO S,TERASAKI P I.HLA compatibility can be predicted by matching only three residues with outward oriented sidechains[J].Transplant Proc,1996,28 (3):1264-1246.
  • 3谭建明,唐孝达,谢桐.人白细胞抗原-氨基酸残基配型标准与免疫反应性研究[J].中华医学杂志,1999,79(11):810-813. 被引量:20
  • 4晏强,眭维国,赵明,林民专,李留洋,刘春晓.交叉反应组抗原配型在肾移植中的应用[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2002,11(4):399-400. 被引量:5
  • 5OPELZ G,WUJCIAK T,MYTILINEOS J.Revisiting HLA matching for kidney transplantation[J].Transplant Proc,1993,25(1 Pt 1):173-175.
  • 6TAKEMOTO SK,CECKA JM,TERASAKI PI.Benefits of HLA-CREG matching for sensitized recipients as illustrated in kidney regrafts[J].Transplant proc,1997,29(1-2):1417.
  • 7OPELAZ G,WUJCIAK T.Cadaveric kidneys should be allocaded acoording the HLA mathch[J].Transplant Proc,1995,27(1):93-99.
  • 8王长希,张白玉,陈立中,毕颖,费继光,朱兰英,郑克立.HLA氨基酸残基配型在免疫致敏受者肾移植中的应用探讨[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2004,25(1):70-73. 被引量:3
  • 9HEISE ER,THACKER LR,MACQUEEN JM,et al.Repeated HLA mismatches and second renal graft survival in centers of the South-Eastern Organ Procurement Foundation[J].Clin Transplant,1996,10(6 Pt 2):579-585.
  • 10EL-AWAR N,TERASAKIP,LAZDA V,et al.Almost all patients who are waiting for regraft of a kidney transplantation have anti-HLA antibodies[J].Transplant Proc,2002,34(7):2531-2532.

二级参考文献16

  • 1谭建明 唐孝达 等.人类白细胞抗原-Ⅰ类抗原的DNA分型与临床应用[J].中华医学杂志,1998,78:763-767.
  • 2马燕 康晓平.配对设计下两组频数分布的χ 2检验 [A].见:方积乾.卫生统计学(第 5版)[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.108- 26.
  • 3[1]Thompson JS, Thacker LR. CREG Ma tching for first cadaveric kidney transplants( TNX) performed by SEOPE centers between 1987 and 1995. Clin Transplant,1996,10:5 86
  • 4[2]Fuller AA, Trevithick JE, Herzenbert L A et al. Topographic map of the HLA-A2 CREG epitopes using human alloantibodie s probes. Hum Immunol,1990,28:284
  • 5[3]Fuller AA, Rodey GE, Parham P et al. Epitope map of the HLA-B7 CREG using af finity-purified human alloantibody, Hum Immunol,1990,28:306
  • 6[4]Takemoto S, Gjertson DW, Terasaki PI. HLA matching:a comparison of conventiona l and molecular approaches. In:Terasaki PI, Cecka JM eds. Clinical transplants. Los Angeles:UCLA Tissue Typing Laborato ry,1992.413
  • 7[5]Rodey GE, Fuller TC. Public epitopes a nd the antigenic structure of the HLA mo lecules. CRC Crit Rev Immunol,1987,7:229
  • 8[6]Rodey GE, Neylan JF, Whelchel JD et a l. Epitope specificity of HLA class I a lloantibodies. I. Frequency analysis of antibodies to private versus public spec ificities in potential transplant recipi ents. Hum Immunol,1994,39:272
  • 9[7]Takemoto S, terasaki PI, Giertson DW et al. Equitable allocation of HLA-comp atible kidneys for local pools and for m inorities. N Engl J Med,1994,331:760
  • 10[8]Yvo WJ Supkens, Ilias IN Doxiadis, J ohan W de Fijter et al. Shareing cress -reactive groups of MHC class I improves long-term graft survival. Kindney Inter ,1999,56:1920

共引文献22

同被引文献27

  • 1Terasaki PI,Gjertson DW,Cecka JM,et al.Significance of the donor age effect on kidney transplants[J].Clin Transplant,1997,11 (5 Pt 1):366-372.
  • 2Kumar A,Verma BS,Srivastava A,et al.Long-term follow up of elderly donors in a live related renal transplant program[J].J Urol,2000,163 (6):1654-1658.
  • 3Morris PJ,Johnson RJ,Fuggle SV,et al.Analysis of factors that affect outcome of primary cadaveric renal transplantation in the UK.HLA Task Force of the Kidney Advisory Group of the United Kingdom Transplant Support Service Authority (UKTSSA)[J].Lancet,1999,354 (9185):1147-1152.
  • 4De La Vega LS,Torres A,Bohorquez HE,et al.Patient and graft outcomes from older living kidney donors are similar to those from younger donors despite lower GFR[J].Kidney Int,2004,66 (4):1654-1661.
  • 5Kerr SR,Gillingham KJ,Johnson EM,et al.Living donors 》 55 years:to use or not to use?[J] Transplantation,1999,67 (7):999-1004.
  • 6Gill JS,Gill J,Rose C,et al.The older living kidney donor; part of the solution to the organ shortage[J].Transplantation,2006,82 (12):1662-1666.
  • 7Perico N,Ruggenenti P,Scalamogna M,et al.Tackling the shortage of donor kidneys:how to use the best that we have[J].Am J Nephrol,2003,23 (4):245-259.
  • 8Ethics Committee of the Transplantation Society.The consensus statement of the Amsterdam Forum on theCare of the Live Kidney Donor[J].Transplantation,2004,78 (4):491-492.
  • 9K(a)lble T,Lucan M,Nicita G,et al.EAU guidelines on renal transplantation[J].Eur Urol,2005,47 (2):156-166.
  • 10Sumrani N,Delaney V,Ding ZK,et al.Renal transplantation from elderly living donors[J].Transplantation,1991,51 (2):305-309.

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部