3Paik H J. Superconducting tensor gravity gradiometer [J]. Bulletin Geodesique, 1981,55: 370～381
4Brovelli M, Sanso F. The study of the Vyy component in the BVP approach [ J ]. Manuscripta Geodaetica,1990, (15): 240～248
5Migliaccio F, Sanso F. The boundary value problem approach to the data reduction for a spaceborne gradiometer mission [ A ]. IAG Symposia 103 [ C ].Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidleberg, New York, 1989.67～77
6Holota P. Boundary value problems and invariants of the gravitational tensor in satellite gradiometry[A]. Sanso F, Rummel R, et al. Theory of Satellite Geodesy and Gravity Field Determination, Lecture Notes in Earth Science ( 25 ) [ M ]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,Heidleberg, New York, 1989
7Keller W. On the treatment of an overdetermined boundary value problem by pseudodifferential operators[A]. Sacedote F, Sanso F, et al. Proceedings of the Ⅱ . Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy[C], 1989. 575～619
8Keller W, Hirsch M. A boundary value approach to downward continuation [ J ]. Manuscripta Geodaetica,1994, 19(2): 101～118
9Keller W. Application of boundary value techniques to satellite gradiometry[A]. Sanso F, Rummel R, et al.Geodetic Boundary Value Problems in View of the One Centimeter Geoid, Lecture Notes in Earth Science (65)[M]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidleberg, New York,1997
10Luo Z C, Ning J S, Chao D B. Overdetermined satellite gravity gradiometry boundary value problem: theory and simulation [A]. lAG Symposia 119 [C]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidleberg, New York, 1997
