期刊文献+

论网络侵权案件中司法管辖权的确认 被引量:5

Study on the Jurisdiction of lnternet Infringement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 网络空间的全球化和虚拟化使网络侵权案件的司法管辖界限变得模糊,也使得传统民事司法管辖的基础受到动摇和冲击。通过对网络侵权管辖现状的评析以及几种具有代表性的新学说的考察,发现在现有条件之下,僵化地适用传统规则和一般性地起用新的管辖根据都是不可取的,变通适用侵权行为地原则以及根据网络空间的特点确定一个指导性的原则,即最密切联系原则,并以侵权行为地、被告住所地、网址等常见的联系因素时该原则进行限制,再根据案件的实际情况确定管辖权的归属,是解决网络侵权案件管辖问题的有效途径。 The traditional jurisdiction was attacked by the globality and dummy space of network that result in the faintness of jurisdiction bounds. As to the jurisdiction of network tortuous cases, we must both develop and correct the traditional jurisdiction theory, and use for reference of new theory, and then the equitable and efficient ju- risdiction will be established. On the basis of researching into traditional jurisdiction and evaluating new theory, we discover that it is necessary to combine the traditional jurisdiction with the new characteristics of network and use it neatly, and also establish "most contact" in principle as a fundamental rule restricting with tortious place, house place of privy, address of network, as acting accordingly with traditional and new theory are both inviable.
作者 蒋敏
出处 《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第2期43-47,共5页 Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
关键词 网络侵权 管辖权 指导原则 司法管辖权 Internet infringement jurisdiction directive principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1詹礼愿.网络时代国际私法的困境与出路[J].中国国际私法与比较法年刊,2002,5(1):381-391. 被引量:1
  • 2张广荣.互联网络中的法律问题[J].环球法律评论,1996,18(4):25-31. 被引量:15
  • 3叶新.论互联网环境下的司法管辖权[J].行政与法,2002(9):92-94. 被引量:3
  • 4周昕,张翼.因特网时代的民事司法管辖权[J].政治与法律,2002(2):71-75. 被引量:15
  • 5王德全.《Internet引起的国际私法问题》.载郑成思.《知识产权研究》(第5卷),中国方正出版社,1998年版,第110页.
  • 6Eric Schneidennan & Ronald Komreieh : "Personal Jurisdiction And Internet Commerce", "The New York Law Journal" ,June 4, 1997.
  • 7Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Corn, Inc., 952F.Supp.1119(W.D.Pa1997)-January16, 1997.
  • 8Jeffrey R.Kuester & Jennifer M. Graves : "Personl Jufisdsdiction on the Internet : Whereis Cyberspace?", http://www.tkhr.com/articles/personal.html, 2000- 08 - 04.
  • 9Soo, Line R. R. Co. V. Hawker Siddeley Canada, 950F. 2d526,528 - 529 (8th Cir. 1991).
  • 10"Personal Jurisdiction", http://www.lclark.edu/-loren/eyberlaw99fall/proiects99/kaupacharya/paper.htm, 2000 - 08 - 17.

共引文献43

同被引文献51

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部