期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌疗效对比分析 被引量:12

Comparative analysis of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy for colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下结直肠癌手术的临床效果。方法回顾分析1996年11月至2006年9月行腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的110例临床资料,并与同期的123例开腹手术进行比较。结果与开腹手术比,腔镜组手术时间略长[(148.0±65.0)Vs(139.0±37.4)min,P=0.000],术中出血量较少[(137.1±128.6)Vs(209.3±101.3)mL,P=0.031],术后肠功能恢复快[(63.7±9.3)Vs(75.2±11.4)h,P=0.072],术后住院天数短[(13.8±5.2)Vs(17.2±5.2)d,P=0.027],手术并发症少,1、3、5年生存率(97.7%、84.7%、66.7%)与开腹组(97.1%、83.1%、67.6%,P=0.051)相近,但清扫淋巴结数量略少于开腹组[(9.1±5.2)Vs(11.2±3.4),P=0.404],且费用较高[(26.8±11.3)Vs(22.5±13.4)千元,P=0.209]。结论腹腔镜大肠癌手术安全、创伤小、并发症少,达到与开腹手术相同的远期效果,但需降低费用,淋巴结清扫有待于加强。 Objective To study the clinical effect of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods Clinical data of 110 cases underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery from November 1996 to August 2006 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with those of 123 comparable patients treated by conventional laparotomy in the same period. Results Comparing with laparotomy group, there was longer mean operative time, less blood loss during operation, shorter postoperative bowel function recovery time, shorter postoperative hospitalization days, less complications, less average number of lymph nodes dissected and higher hospitalization costs in laparoscopic surgery group. The postoperative 1-, 3-,Syear survival of laparoscopic surgery group was 97.1% ,83.1%, 67.6% , respectively, equivalent to that of laparotomy surgery( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer is safe, with minimal invasion and rare complications. It can achieve long-term effect as conventional laparotomy. But the medical expenses must be lowered and systemic lymph node clearance should be improved.
出处 《微创医学》 2007年第1期13-15,共3页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
关键词 结直肠癌 腹腔镜 疗效 Colorectal cancer Laparoscopy Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1顾晋.全直肠系膜切除术[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(15):950-952. 被引量:87
  • 2郑民华,毛志海.腹腔镜手术在胃肠外科的应用现状[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(5):389-391. 被引量:39
  • 3[1]Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991,1:144-150.
  • 4Vukasin P,Orkga AE,Greene FL,et al.Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection:results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry.Dis Colon Rectum,1996,39:20-23.
  • 5Berends FJ,Kazemier G,Bonjer HJ,et al.Subcutancous metastases after laparpscopic colectomy.Lancet,1994,344:58-60.
  • 6Lezoche E,Feliciotti F,Paganini AM,et al.Laparoscopic.VS open hemicolectomy for colon cancer.Sury Endosc,2002,16:596-602.
  • 7Korolija D,Tadic S,Simic D.Extent of oncological resection in laparoscopic vs.open colorectal surgery:meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg,2003,387:366-371.
  • 8Lacy AM,Garcia-Valdecasas JC,Dolgado S,et al.Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:a randomized trial.Lancet,2002,359:2224-2229.
  • 9Scheidach H,Schneider C,Hugel O,et al.Laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group:Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Surg Endosc,2003,17:903-910.
  • 10陆少美 张自顺 颜南生.腹腔镜下腹会阴联合切除直肠癌根治术[J].北京医科大学学报,1994,26:308-309.

共引文献48

同被引文献113

引证文献12

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部