期刊文献+

受教育权的国家义务分类浅析 被引量:5

On the Typology of State Obligations Relating to the Right to Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国家对受教育权的实现负有法律义务。国家的义务既是“积极的”,又是“消极的”。国家的义务主要分为尊重的义务、保护的义务和实现的义务。受教育权的最低核心义务与资源的可用性无关。国家在教育上的核心义务可以划分为:教育的可获得性方面的义务、教育的可进入性方面的义务、教育的可接受性方面的义务以及教育的可适应性方面的义务。 The states have legal obligations for the realization of the right to education. Their obligations are both ' positive' and ' negative', which can be distinguished as the obligations to ' respect', ' to protect', and ' to fulfill'. Minimum core obligations are not determined by the availability of resources. States' core human rights obligations in education can be classified as the obligations to make education available, accessible, acceptable and adaptable.
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期69-73,共5页 International and Comparative Education
基金 全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目"受教育权利研究"(项目号:200307)的部分研究成果
关键词 受教育权 国家义务分类 最低的核心义务 right to education typology of state obligations minimum core obligations
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Philip Alston and Gerard Quinn,"The Nature and Scope of States Parties' Obligation under the International Covenant on Economic,Social and Cultural Rights",in Human Rights Quarterly,1987,p.159.
  • 2Henry Shue,Basic Rights-Subsistence,Affluence and U.S.Foreign Policy,Princeton University Press,Princeton,New Jersey,1996,2nd edition,p.52.
  • 3Committee on Economic,Social and Cultural Rights,General Comment No.3,The Nature of States Parities Obligations (Art.2,para.1 of the Covenant),5th Session,in U.N.Doc.E/C.14/12/1990 (1990),para.10.
  • 4Fons Coomans,"In Search of the Core Content of the Right to Education",in:A.Chapman & S.Russell (eds.),Core Obligations:Building a Framework for Economic,Social and Cultural Rights,Antwerp,Intersentia,2002,pp.217-246,pp.217-246.
  • 5Katarina Tomasevski,Manual on Rights-based Education:Global Human Rights Requirements Made Simple,Bangkok:UNESCO Bangkok,2004,pp.7-9,p.8.
  • 6Louis Henkin,"A Post-Cold War Human Rights Agenda",in Yale Journal of International Law,Vol.19,1994,p.250.
  • 7G.J.H.van Hoof,"The Legal Nature of Economic,Social and Cultural Rights:A Rebuttal of Some Traditional Views",in Philip Alston and Katarina Tomasevski (eds.),The Right to Food,Den Haag:.Nijhoff,Utrecht:SIM,1984,p.106.
  • 8孙世彦.论国际人权法下国家的义务[J].法学评论,2001,19(2):91-96. 被引量:44
  • 9Henry Steiner and Philip Alston,International Human Rights in Context,2nd edition,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000,p.182.
  • 10陈醇.论国家的义务[J].法学,2002(8):15-19. 被引量:44

二级参考文献52

  • 1刘作翔.法治社会中的权力和权利定位[J].法学研究,1996,18(4):69-79. 被引量:79
  • 2洛克.《政府论》下篇[M].商务印书馆,1964年版.第5、64页.
  • 3[美]希尔斯曼.《美国是如何治理的》.商务印书馆1986年版,第341页.
  • 4[美]埃尔金,索乌坦.《新宪政论-为美好的社会设计政治制度》.周叶廉译.生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997年版,第156页.
  • 5[美]伯恩斯,佩尔塔森,克罗林.《美国式民主》.谭君久等译.中国社会科学出版社,1993年版,第772页.
  • 6(奥)凯尔森著.《法与国家的一般理论》,沈宗灵译,中国大百科全书出版社,1996年版,第348页.
  • 7Human Rights Committee, General Comment 24(Fifty- second session, 1994), para. 8. UN Doe. CCPR/C/21/Rev. 1/Add. 6, (1994).
  • 8Geraldine van Bueren,"Deconstructing the Mythologies of International Human Rights Law". in Conor Gearty.and Adam Tomkins, eds. ,Understanding Human Rights.596,at 603(1996).
  • 9Paul Sieghart,The International Law of Human Rights,at 17(1983).
  • 10Imre Szabo,op, tit, at 11.

共引文献83

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部