摘要
文章从工具论出发,就如何看待关于修辞原则的不同表述阐述了个人看法。指出:所以出现不同表述是因为存在不同需要,几乎每一种表述都是长短互见。目前所谓修辞原则有的属于操作原则,有的属于效应原则,有的属于操作原则与效应原则的结合,进行比较研究时不能违反“异类不比”的规则。文章认为在修辞原则建立上应当鼓励多元化。但这不等于怎么说都行。文章结合实例,就修辞原则研究中需要注意的问题作了论析。
The article focused on how to treat different interpretations of the rhetoric principles from an instrumental position. It pointed out that need is the real reason that why there are different views on this question, almost every view has its own strongpoint and defects. As is shown in the article, so - called rhetoric principles present are sometimes operating principles, sometimes effective ones, sometimes combination of both. So, the rule of "Don't compare to variant kinds of things" should be complied when they are compared to each other. Multianalysis should be encouraged on rhetoric principles' establishment even though it is not equal to say whatever they want. The article also discussed some issues need to be paid attention to by examples analysis.
出处
《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期59-63,共5页
Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
修辞原则
不同表述
rhetoric principles, different comments