期刊文献+

氟西汀联合奥氮平治疗抑郁症的临床疗效和安全性 被引量:6

Efficacy and safety evaluation of fluoxetine plus olanzapine in the treatment of depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价氟西汀联合奥氮平治疗抑郁症的临床疗效和安全性。方法:将符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3)诊断标准的60例抑郁症患者按就诊单双日分成2组,疗程8周;研究组30例,给予氟西汀20mg/d及奥氮平5mg/d口服;对照组30例,单用氟西汀20mg/d;用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD24项)及不良反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果:治疗8周后,研究组显效率为86.7%,对照组为63.3%,2组间疗效比较,经Ridit分析差异有显著意义(P<0.05);研究组在治疗后1周末起效,对照组在2周末起效;治疗后1~8周末2组间HAMD评分差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。各周末TESS差异均无显著意义(P>0.05)。结论:氟西汀联合奥氮平治疗抑郁症起效快,并能有效改善睡眠障碍和焦虑及躯体化症状,疗效优于对照组,不良反应无明显增加。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine plus olanzapine regimen in the treatment of depression. Methods A total of 60 patients with depression, diagnosed by Chinese classification of mental disorders-3 (CCMD-3) criteria, were divided into research group and control group. The patients in the research group were treated with fluoxetine(20 mg/d) plus olanzapine(5 mg/d) regimen, and those in control group were treated with fluoxetine(20 mg/d) alone. The efficacy and adverse effects were evaluated by Hamilton depression rating scale for depression (HAMD) and treatment emergent symptom scale(TESS) scoring system, respectively. Results After 8 weeks treatment, the percentage of patients with significant efficacy in research group was 86.7%, and that in control group was 63.3%(Х^2=9.5,P=0.022). The time to response in research group and control group was 1 week and 2 weeks, respectively. The results of HAMD score demonstrated significant difference between two groups at each weekend during the treatment period. Yet, the results of TESS didn't show similar difference. Conclusions The efficacy of fluoxetine plus olanzapine regimen is better than that of fluoxetine alone in the treatment of depression without additional adverse events, expecially in the improvement of sleeping disorder,orexis, as well as the feeling of body discomfort.
出处 《内科理论与实践》 2007年第2期106-108,共3页 Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice
关键词 氟西汀 奥氮平 抑郁症 Fluoxetine Olanzapine Depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献32

  • 1杨献红,黄继忠,严和骎,江开达,陆峥,盛尤荣,熊祥玉,冯明德,姚维菊,吴敏.奥氮平治疗精神分裂症70例临床分析[J].上海精神医学,2002,14(2):94-96. 被引量:26
  • 2陈静,陆峥.非典型抗精神病药治疗难治性抑郁症[J].上海精神医学,2004,16(5):301-303. 被引量:50
  • 3王骞,李胜书,王克.奥氮平辅助治疗难治性抑郁症的观察[J].山东精神医学,2005,18(1):48-49. 被引量:19
  • 4王冠军,王立涛.维思通辅助治疗难治性抑郁症的效果[J].齐鲁医学杂志,2005,20(1):48-49. 被引量:9
  • 5汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,:202-209.
  • 6Schatzberg A F.New approaches to managing psychotic depression[J].J Clin Psychiatry,2003,64(Suppl 1):19-23.
  • 7Shelton R C,Tollefson G D,Tohen M,et al.Anovel augmentation strategy for treating resistant major depression[J].Am J Psychiatry,2001,158(1):131-134.
  • 8Bymaster FP.In vitro and in vivo biochemistry of olanzapine.J Clin Psychiatry,1997,58 Suppl 10:28-36.
  • 9Kapur S,Zipursky RB,Remington G,et al.Clinical and theoretical implications of 5-HT2 and D2 receptor occupancy of clozapine,risperidone,and olanzapine in schizophrenia.Am J Psychiatry,1999,156:286-293.
  • 10Shelton RC,Tollefson GD,Tohen M,et al.A novel augmentation strategy for treating resistant major depression.Am J psychiatry,2001,158:131-134.

共引文献67

同被引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部