期刊文献+

三种术式子宫切除的效果比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Three Kinds of Hysterectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨经腹子宫全切术(TAH)、阴式子宫全切术(TVH)、腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫全切术(LAVH)的特点及效果。【方法】回顾性分析2002年1月至2005年12月间TAH 1 060例、TVH 72例、LAVH 59例的临床资料。【结果】TAH组的手术时间(78.7±6.3)min显著短于TVH组(95.2±30.2)min和LAVH组(90.2±30.7)min;术中出血量LAVH组(100±55.1)ml和TVH(110±56.1)ml显著少于TAH组(139.3±7.8)ml;术后镇痛率TAH组(74.1%,785例)显著高于TVH组(20.8%,15例)和LAVH组(18.6%,11例);术后住院时间TAH组(12.1±1.1)d显著长于TVH组(8.5±4.2)d和LAVH组(5.5±1.3)d;术后发热率TAH组(5.9%,63例),TVH组(4.2%,3例),LAVH组(5.1%,3例)差异均无显著性。【结论】TVH和LAVH创伤小、病人痛苦少,术后恢复快。而LAVH适应的指征更宽。 [Objective]To compare the effects of transabdominal hysterectomy (TAH) , transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) , and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). [Methods]Clinical data of 1060 cases of TAH ( TAH Group) , 72 cases of TVH (TVH Group) , and 59 cases of LAVH (LAVH Group) were retrospectively analyzed. [Results]The operation time was shorter in the TAH Group (78.7 ± 6.3)min than in the TVH Group (95.2±30. 2)min and the LAVH Group (90.2±30.7)min. The intraoperative blood loss was more in the TAH Group (139.3±7.8)ml than in the TVH Group (110±56.1)ml and the LAVH Group (100 ± 55.1)ml. The postoperative analgesic requirement rate was higher in the TAH Group (74.1%, 785 cases) than in the TVH Group ( 20.8% , 15 cases) and the LAVH Group ( 18.6%, 11 cases). The length of postoperative hospitalization was longer in the TAH Group (12.1 ± 1.1)d than in the TVH Group (8.5±4.2)d and the LAVH Group (5.5±1.3)d. The postoperative pyrexia rates were not significantly different among the TAH Group (5. 9%, 63 cases) , the TVH Group ( 4. 2% , 3 cases) , and the LAVH Group (5.1% , 3cases). [Conclusion]As compared with transabdominal hysterectomy, transvaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy show advantages of less invasion, less pain, and quicker recovery. Both of LAVH and TVH are minimally invasive surgery, but TVH fits the patients with little, prolapse uterus, and LAVH even fits those with appendix-cyst and large uterus.
作者 石筱平
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2007年第3期436-438,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 子宫切除术/方法 hysterectomy/MT
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献26

  • 1袁碧波 陈亚萍.借助腹腔镜阴式子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术的岁机性、前瞻性、多中心研究.国外医学妇产科分册,1999,26(6):367-367.
  • 2刘彦.实用妇科腹腔镜手术学[M].北京:北京科技出版社,1996,6..
  • 3Reich H. Laparoscopic hysterectomy[J].J Gynecol Surg, 1989,5:213- 216.
  • 4Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, et al. Laparoscopiclly assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol,1999;180 : 270.
  • 5Stephen K,Mark G,Susan D, et al. Quality of life,health care utilization,and costs among women undergoing hysterectomy in a managed-care setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol,1998,178:91-100.
  • 6Marie E,Jose FN,Mats H,et al. A randomized trial with a Cost-Consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol,1998,91:30-34.
  • 7Lumsden MA, Twaddle S, Hawthorn RA, et al. Randomized comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG, 2000,107(11):1386-1391.
  • 8Kovac SR. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol,2000,95(6 Pt 1):787-793.
  • 9Gloria A,Bachmann G,Hystertomy.A critical review.J Reprod Men,1990,35:839-862.
  • 10苏应宽主编.妇产科手术学.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1985,103-138.

共引文献440

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部