域外证据的特别证明程序探析——兼论《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第11条

Study on the notarial and authenticated procedure of overseas evidence——and comment on Art.11 of Some Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Procedures

结合《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第11条的规定,对域外证据的公证认证程序进行论述,认为公证认证程序作为域外证据取得证据能力前提条件的规定存在弊端,同时认为,“经过公证的域外证据”与“公证证据”是两个不同的概念,在证据效力上不能等同,并对相关立法提出建议。

On the basis of Art. 11 of Some Provisions of the Supreme People＇s Court on Evidence in Civil Procedures, this paper discusses the defect of Art. 11, analyzes the differences between notarized overseas evidence and notarial evidence and makes suggestions of legislation related to the notarial and authenticated procedure of overseas evidence.