摘要
同命不同价案引起人们对法律面前人人平等的质疑。最高人民法院[2003]20号关于死亡赔偿金的规定的解释,在逻辑上不失为正义。从法哲学角度来看,法律的形式正义往往与实质正义会发生冲突,但正义作为法律价值却是变化发展的,是相对的,正义价值将推动法律的改革与发展。
The case of same lives with different value made people doubted that the law is fair for everyone. The judicial explanation [2003]20 from the people＇s superior court about compensation for death is impartial logically . From philosophy of law , inconsistency between form and essential of justice always exists. However justice as the value of law never stay the same forever. Justice value will drive law to develop and innovate.
出处
《边疆经济与文化》
2007年第4期47-48,共2页
The Border Economy and Culture
关键词
死亡赔偿金
形式正义
实质正义
正义价值
平等
compensation for death
form of justice
essential of justice
justice value
fairness
