期刊文献+

审计师道德决策模型比较及启示:基于准则与基于认知发展阶段 被引量:8

Comparison and Implications of Auditor's Ethical Decision Models:Standards based and Cognitive Developmentalist Stage Based
下载PDF
导出
摘要 审计职业一直致力于保持较高的道德标准以维持声誉。但近年来,审计职业面临着严重的道德危机。审计职业寄希望于提高道德准则,以较为谨慎的“基于准则”的决策模型指导审计师决策。虽然这一道德决策模型是审计师道德判断最为重要的依据,但实践中有大量道德准则没有包括的因素。为了将这些因素纳入道德决策过程,本文根据认知发展阶段理论提出了基于认知发展阶段的审计师道德决策模型,并将之与基于准则的决策模型比较,从而作为基于准则的模型的有益补充。基于认知发展阶段的审计师道德决策模型也有助于对审计师道德判断相关问题进行实证研究。 The audit profession has been devoted to maintain highly ethical standards to enjoy reputation. But in recent years, the audit profession is experiencing ethical crisis. Auditors are responded to this potential crisis by improving ethical standards as the standards based model to guide auditors' ethical decision making. Although the standard based model is the primary basis of auditors' ethical judgment, there are many factors that have not yet been considered in this model. In order to take these factors into the decision making process, we develop the cognitive developmentalist stage based model and compare it with the standard based model so as to a useful complement to auditors'ethical decision making. The cognitive developmentalist stage based model also can be used as a basis for empirical studies.
作者 吴建友
出处 《审计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期75-80,共6页 Auditing Research
关键词 审计师 道德决策模型 准则 认知发展阶段 auditors, ethical decision models, standards, cognitive developmentalist stage
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1陈汉文,韩洪灵.注册会计师职业道德准则之变迁——基于公共合约观的描述与分析[J].审计研究,2005(3):10-17. 被引量:18
  • 2AICPA. 1988. Code of Professional Conduc. New York.
  • 3Anderson,G. D. ,and R.C. Ellyson. 1986. Restructuring professional standards:The Anderson report. Journal of Accounlancy (March) : 92-104.
  • 4Auditing Practice Board. 2004. Ethical Standard, 1-5.
  • 5Glezen,G. W. , and W. Alexander. 1989. An investigation of CPAs'understanding of therevised code of professional conduct. Southwest American Accounting Association Meeting,Dallas.
  • 6Hanis,J. E. , and M. A. Reynolds. 1991. Formal codes: The delineation of ethical dilemmas. Critical Perspectives Symposium, New York.
  • 7ICAEW. 2006. Code of Ethics.
  • 8Kohlberg, L. 1976. Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In Moral Development and Behavior,cal. T. Likona,31-53. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • 9Lampe,J. C. ,and D. W. Finn. 1992. A model of aud itors'ethi-cal decision processes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, V. 11, Supplement, 33-59,35.
  • 10Rest,J. R. 1979. Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

二级参考文献25

  • 1陈汉文 韩洪灵.[D].厦门大学会计系,2004.
  • 2G·J·普雷维茨 B·D·梅里诺(刘长文译 常勋校).“美国会计史——会计文化意义上的历史阐述”.厦门大学会计系打印资料[Z].,1985..
  • 3AICPA. 1973. Rules of Professional Conduct. New York.
  • 4AICPA. 1986. Restructuring Professional Standards to Achieve Professional Excellence in a Changing Environment. New York.
  • 5AICPA. 1997. Servin4g the Public Interest: A New Concept Framework for Auditor Independence. AICPA website.
  • 6AICPA. 2002. A History of Accounting & Auditing Standards.AICPA website.
  • 7AICPA. 2003. RE: PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No.004-Statement Regarding the Establishment of Auditing and Other Professional Standards. AICPA website.
  • 8Broaker et al. 1897. The American Accountants Manual. Vol. 1,New York: p. 45.
  • 9Broaker, F. and Chapman, R. 1897. The American Accountants Manual, Vol. 1 . New York.
  • 10Dickinson,A. L. 1904. The Duties and Responsibilities of Public Accountant. Price Waterhouse & Co..

共引文献17

同被引文献35

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部