期刊文献+

GPI理论研究及美国应用案例对我国的启示 被引量:4

Genuine Progress Indicator Methodology Study and the Inspiration of the Multi-scale Application Case in U.S.A.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用GDP核算体系衡量国家和区域的发展存在明显的缺陷,真实发展指数GPI包括经济、社会和环境三个子帐户,包含了一些被GDP所忽略的成本和价值,构建了可量度的可持续发展指标体系来衡量区域经济健康程度和可持续发展能力。本文介绍了GPI的产生和组成帐户,对GPI核算框架与计算方法进行了研究,评介了美国不同区域尺度上的GPI核算应用案例,总结了GPI核算的优点与实施难点,并对在我国开展GPI核算提出了几点建议。 GDP has some obvious disadvantages in measuring the development progress of a nation and/or a region. Genuine Progress Indicator(GPI) includes three sub-accounts-economic, social and environmental ones. GPI puts into accounting system some of the cost and value which have been ignored by GDP. And it has been constructed to be a kind of measurable sustainability indicators to assess the healthy degree of regional economy and the capacity of sustainable progress. This article introduces the accounting framework and the methods of GPI, and reviews the case of multi-scale application in the USA. Through summarizing, the author put forward some advice to improve the development of GPI accounting application in China.
出处 《世界地理研究》 2007年第1期14-20,7,共8页 World Regional Studies
关键词 国内生产总值(GDP) 真实发展指数(GPI) 区域 可持续发展 Gross Domestic Product Genuine Progress Indicator region Sustainability Progress
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1钟兆修.坚持科学发展观 推行绿色核算[J].国家行政学院学报,2004(4):14-17. 被引量:10
  • 2温宗国,张坤民,陈伟强,杜斌,宋国君.真实发展指标的方法学研究及其应用[J].中国软科学,2004(8):145-151. 被引量:7
  • 3李刚,柳杰民,朱龙杰.GDP缺陷与GPI核算[J].统计研究,2001,18(12):31-35. 被引量:7
  • 4Clifford Cobb,Gary Sue Goodman,Mathis Wackernagel,Why Bigger isn't Better:The Genuine Progress Indicator-1999 Update[R].San Francisco,Calif:Redefining Progress,November 1999.
  • 5Clifford Cobb,Ted Halstead,Jonathan Rowe.The Genuine Progress Indicator:Summary of Data and Methodology[R].San Francisco,Calif.:Redefining Progress.1995.
  • 6Jason Venetoulis,Cliff Cobb,The Genuine Progress Indicator 1950-2002(2004 Update)[R].Sustainability Indicator Program,March 2004.
  • 7Clifford Cobb,Gary Sue Goodman,Joanne C.May Kliejunas,Blazing Sun Overhead and Clouds on the Horizon:The Genuine Progress Report for 1999[R].Oakland:Redefining Progress.
  • 8Robert Costanza,Jon Erickson,Karen Fligger,et al.Estimates of the Genuine Progress Indicator(GPI) for Vermont,Chittenden County and Burlington,from 1950 to 2000[J].Ecological Economics,2004,51:39-155.

二级参考文献28

  • 1中华人民共和国林业部.中国林业年鉴[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1994.15-68.
  • 2国家统计局.中国统计年鉴,1994-2000[M].中国统计出版社,..
  • 3国家统计局农村社会经济调查总队.中国农村统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,1994-2000..
  • 4国家统计局1998环境统计专题组.1998中国环境统计[M].中国统计出版社,1999..
  • 5中国地质矿产年鉴编纂委员会.中国地质矿产年鉴[M].海洋出版社,1994-2000..
  • 6国家统计局人口和社会科技统计司、劳动和社会保障不规划财务司.中国劳动统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,1994-2000..
  • 7[7]Clive Hamilton, Richard Denniss. Tracking Well- being in Australia, the Genuine Progress Indicator 2000 [ R]. The Australia Institute. Discussion Paper No. 35, ISSN 13225421, 2000.
  • 8[8]Nick Hanley, Ian Moffatt, Robin Faichneyb, et al. Measuring Sustainability: a Time Series of Alternative Indicators for Scotland[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, (28): 55-73.
  • 9[9]Eric Neumayer. On the Methodology of ISEW, GPI and Related Measures: Some Constructive Suggestions and Some Doubt on the ' Threshold' Hypothesis [J] . Ecological Economics, 2000, (34): 347- 361.
  • 10[10]Desai, Meghnad. Income and Alternative Measures of Well - being: Monitoring Social Progress in the 1990s[R].Brookfield, USA: Averbury, Published for UNRISD,1993.23 - 40.

共引文献19

同被引文献20

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部