不安抗辩权的效力探究

On the Effect of Unstable Counter Argument Right

在简要阐述不安抗辩权的含义及我国立法现状的基础上,着重讨论在不安抗辩权效力的设计上,中止履行的范围是否及于履行的准备行为;中止履行的时间应否自合同成立后开始;后履行方提供适当担保时间的确定;后履行方拒绝及时提供适当的担保时,先履行方取得合同的解除权是否是不安抗辩权的效力。对这个问题的探讨,有利于深化对不安抗辩权效力的认识,建立更加完善的规则,促进司法实践。

This article expounded briefly the import and legislation current situation of Unstable Counter Argument Right, and discussed chiefly if the field of suspending discharge covered the prepare of discharge on the design of the effect of Unstable Counter Argument Right, if the time of suspending discharge began from execution of contract, the time determination of offering fit ensure of the party which the next to discharge, and if renouncementright of contract of the party which the first to discharge was the effect of Unstable Counter Argument Right when the party which the next to discharge refused to offer timely fit ensure. This article will be conducive to know the effect of Unstable Counter Argument Right, establish of more perfect rules and improve judicial practice.