期刊文献+

面向装配序列规划的装配成本评价研究 被引量:1

Research on assembly cost evaluation for assembly sequence planning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对装配序列的特点提出了一个装配成本评价的模型,认为装配成本与产品装配过程中装配方向的变化次数,产品组成零件装配后的运动不确定度总和有关。提出了基于零件的装配方向矩阵确定装配方向变化次数的方法,并根据装配基础件确定零件装配后的运动不确定度。采用了基于优先关系矩阵的干涉推理方法检验装配序列的可行性,并计算装配序列中可能产生的装配干涉数目,最后用实例验证了所提模型的有效性。 An assembly cost evaluation model for assembly sequence planning is proposed, in which the assembly cost is based on the changing times of assembly direction during assembling process and the total motion uncertainty degree of parts. A method based on assembly direction matrix to calculate the changing times of assembly direction is submitted. The motion uncertainty degree of parts is calculated based on the benchmark of assembling. An inference method based on the assembly precedence relation matrix is adopted to verify the feasibility of the assembly sequence and the assembly intervene numbers in an assembly sequence are yielded. At last, the validity of proposed model is verified.
出处 《机械设计与制造》 北大核心 2007年第4期165-167,共3页 Machinery Design & Manufacture
关键词 装配成本评价 装配方向变化 零件运动不确定度 装配干涉 Assembly Cost Evaluation Assembly Direction Changing Motion UncertaintyDegree of Parts Assembly Interference
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献6

  • 1马玉林 储林波 等.机器人装配规划的自动生成[J].机器人,1998,20:177-180.
  • 2Homem de Mello L S,Sanderson A C. Evaluation and Selection of Assembly Plans. Proceedings of the IEEE 1990 International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA,1990.
  • 3de Mello L S H. Two Criteria for the Selection of Assembly Plans: Maximizing the Flexibility of Sequencing the Assembly Tasks and Minimizing the Assembly Time through Parallel Execution of Assembly Tasks. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation,1993, 17(5): 626~633.
  • 4Cegkarek D J. Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation of Adaptive Sheet Metal Assembly System.Annals of the CIRP, 1998, 47(1):7~22.
  • 5刘继红.DFX:面向产品生命周期的设计(上)[J].计算机辅助设计与制造,1998(9):34-36. 被引量:17
  • 6郭伟,王凤岐,杜玉明,胡素梅.产品生命周期需求的分析及其间映射方法的研究[J].机械工程学报,1998,34(5):40-48. 被引量:15

共引文献64

同被引文献14

  • 1佟振博,孙朝阳,王刚,吕民,高国安.面向工程系统研制的可制造性评价策略研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(10):1461-1464. 被引量:5
  • 2Ashley S. Steel cars face a weighty decision[J]. Mechanical Engineering, 1997, 119(2) : 56- 61.
  • 3Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P. Product Design for Manufacturing and Assembly E M 1- New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994.
  • 4Lyu N, Saitou K. Topology optimization of multicomponent beam structure via decomposition- based assembly synthesis. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2005, 127(2) : 170-183.
  • 5Coello C A C, Van Veldhuizen D A, Lamont G B. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi- Objective Problems[ M]. New York: Kluwer Academic, 2002.
  • 6Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratab A, Meyarivan T. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algo- rithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II [ R]. KanGAL report 200001, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India, 2000.
  • 7Malen D, Kikuchi N. Automotive body structure--a GM sponsored course in the university of Michigan[ R]. ME599 Coursepack, University of Michigan, 2002.
  • 8刘中华,张颖超.深度优先搜索的非递归算法[J].科技信息,2010(25):160-161. 被引量:8
  • 9赵荣远.汽车虚拟装配技术及其可装配性评价分析[J].上海汽车,2011(3):45-49. 被引量:5
  • 10蔡伟,张桂香.基于成本和并行装配的装配序列有向图求解[J].微计算机信息,2012,28(2):22-24. 被引量:2

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部