2Engelhardt T Jr. , Caplan A L. Patterns of Controversy and Closure: The Interplay of Knowledge, Values, and Political Forces . In Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. and Ar- thur L. Caplan (eds.), Scientific Controversies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1987: 1--26.
3Nelkin D. Science Controversies: The Dynamics of Public Disputes in the United States. In Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, Trevor Pinch (eds). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (1st edition), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.. 444--456.
4Pinch T, Leuenberger C. Researching Scientific Controversies: The STS Perspec- tive. Paper presented to the EASTS Conference "Science Controversy and Democra- cy. " National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, August 3--5, 2006.
5Birrer F. Counter Analysis: Toward Social and Normative Restraints on the Produc- tion and Use of Scientific and Technological Knowledge. In Thomas Brante, Steve Fuller and William Lynch (eds). Controversial Science: From Content to Conten- tion, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 1993: 41--56.
6Merton R K. Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Sci- ence. American Sociological Review, 1957, 22(6) : 635--659.
7Mitroff I I. Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scien- tists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 1974, 39(4): 579--595.
8Graham L R. The Socio-political Roots of Boris Hessen: Soviet Marxism and the History of Science. Social Studies of Science, 1985, 15(4): 705--722.
9Bernal J D. Science in History ( 2nd edition). London: Watts, 1957.. 458.
10Sarton G. Boyle and Bayle: the Sceptical Chemist and the Sceptical Historian. Chymia, 1950, 3.. 155--189.
