期刊文献+

水产品反倾销及其经济效应分析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 反倾销是WTO允许成员对国内产业实施保护的一种手段,20世纪90年代以前在世界水产品贸易中很少出现。随着全球特别是发展中国家水产养殖业的迅猛发展和贸易的快速增长,现今发达国家实施的反倾销措施日渐增多,反倾销调查的产品也从捕捞加工产品如罐装金枪鱼转向水产养殖产品如鲑鱼、鲇鱼、对虾等等。本文概述了世界水产品反倾销,分析了反倾销措施的经济效应,如贸易保护效应、调查效应、贸易转移效应等,并指出反倾销并不是一种具有经济合理性的政策措施。
作者 艾红
出处 《中国渔业经济》 2007年第1期41-43,50,共4页 Chinese Fisheries Economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Tung NT,Van Thanh N,Phillips M.Policy research-Implications of liberalization of fish trade for developing countries:A case study of Vietnam[R].Project PR 26109.Rome:FAO,2004.
  • 2[2]Bostock T,Greenhalgh P,Kleih U.Policy research-Implications for liberalisation of fish trade for developing countries:Synthesis report[R].Chatham,UK:Natural Resources Institute,2004.
  • 3[3]保罗·克鲁格曼,茅瑞斯·奥伯斯法尔德.国际经济学(4版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
  • 4彭美秀.对WTO《反倾销协议》的几点质疑[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2002(6):20-22. 被引量:5
  • 5[5]Prusa T J.The trade effects of US antidumping actions.In:Feenstra R C (Ed.).The effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies[R].University of Chicago Press,Chicago,1997.
  • 6[6]Asche F.When anti-dumping measures lead to increased market power; A case study of the European salmon market[R].Discussion paper,2003.

二级参考文献6

共引文献4

同被引文献12

  • 1Krupp C, Pollard P S. Market responses to antidumping laws: Some evidence from the US chemical industry[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1996,29:199-227.
  • 2Prusa T J. The trade effects of US antidumping actions. In: Feenstra R C (Ed.). The effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies. Univorsity of Chicago Press, Chicago,1997.
  • 3Brenton P. Anti-dumping policies in the EU and trade diversion[J]. Europe Journal of Political Economy, 2001,17:593-607.
  • 4Lasagni A. Does country-targeted anti-dumping policy by the EU create trade diversion? [J].Journal of World Trade, 2000,34 (4): 137-159.
  • 5Konings J, Vendenbussche H, Springael L. Import diversion under European antidumping policy [J]. Journal of Industry,Competition and Trade, 2001,1(3):283-299.
  • 6Cuyvers L, Dumont M. EU anti-dumping measures against ASEAN countries: Impact on trade flows [J]. Asina Economic Jorunal, 2005,19(3):249-271.
  • 7Malhotra N, Kassam S. Antidumping duties in the agriculture sector: Trade restricting or trade deflecting? Selected paper prepared for presentation at the American agricultureal economics association annual meeting, Long Beach, California,July 23-26,2006 [EB/OL].http: //www.econ.ubc.ca/ine/papers/wp033.pdf/2006-10-20.
  • 8Carter C A, Gunning-Trant C. U.S. trade remedy law and agriculture: trade diversion and investigation effects [EB/OL]. http://ccarter.ucdavis.edu/page.php?id=36/2007-08-10.
  • 9U.S.International Trade Commission. Certain Frozen or Canned Warmwater Shrimp and Pawns From Brazil, China, Equador, India, Thailand, and Vietnam Investigations Nos.731-TA-1063--1068(Fihal), Publication 3748 January, Washington,DC 20436. http://www. usitc.gov. 2005.
  • 10Josupeit Helga. Shrimp market access, tariffs and regulations [EB/OL]. World Shrimp Markets 2004, 26-27 October 2004, Madrid, Spain. http://www.globefish.org/index.php/id=2288/2007-5-2.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部