期刊文献+

切分语篇表征理论对搭桥推理的解释 被引量:3

Explaining Bridging Inferences:An SDRT Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 搭桥推理指的是根据某个显性结构对其所隐含的指称对象进行推理的过程,而切分语篇表征理论是对语篇进行解释的一种动态语义学理论,它用逻辑形式化的方法,系统地给出了如何在动态语境的条件下明确语词和语句意义的具体做法,实现了对自然语言的形式语义刻画,使许多在静态语义条件下不能解决的语言现象得到了解释;切分语篇表征理论中提出的最大化语篇连贯原则认为,以具有最大关联度的方式理解语篇,就等于以具有最大连贯度的方式理解语篇;使用该原则,并结合一个限制回指解释的句法条件即右边界限制条件,可以对搭桥推理做出新的解释。本文对此进行了探讨和评价。 Bridging inference is the process of inferring an implicit Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT) is a dynamic semantic referent through some explicit structure. Segmented theory of discourse interpretation. It systematically explores the logical and formal approach to interpreting the semantics of the natural language in a dynamic context, and can explain a lot of otherwise unsolved linguistic phenomena. Its principle of Maximise Discourse Coherence argues that interpreting discourse in the maximally relevant fashion amounts to interpreting discourse in the maximally coherent fashion. Attempts are made by the proponents of the principle to explain bridging inferences through MDC combined with the right-frontier constraint. This paper explains the process in detail and makes a brief comment on it.
作者 王勇
出处 《西安外国语大学学报》 2007年第1期1-4,共4页 Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
关键词 切分语篇表征理论 搭桥推理 右边界限制条件 最大化语篇连贯 关联理论 SDRT bridging inference right-frontier constraint MDC relevance theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1[1]Asher,N.Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse[M].Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1993.
  • 2[2]Asher,N.& A.Lascarides.Bridging[J].Journal of Semantics,1998(1):83-113.
  • 3[3]Asher,N.& A.Lascarides.Logics of Conversation[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.
  • 4[4]Clark,H.H.Bridging[A].In P.N.Johnson-Laird & P.C.Wason (eds.).Thinking:Readings in Cognitive Science[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1977:411-420.
  • 5[5]Grosz,B.& C.Sidner.Attention,intentions and the structure of discourse[J].Computational Linguistics,1986(12):175-204.
  • 6[6]Heim,I.The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases[D].Ph.D.thesis,University of Massachusetts,1982.
  • 7[7]Kamp,H.A theory of truth and semantic representation[A].In M.B.J.Stokhof,J.A.G..Groenendijk,T.M.V.Janssen(eds.).Formal Methods in the Study of Language[C].Amsterdam:Mathematisch Centrum,1981:277-322.
  • 8[8]Kamp,H.& U.Reyle.From Discourse to Logic:Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language,Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory[M].Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1993.
  • 9[9]Lascarides,A.& N.Asher.Temporal interpretation,discourse relations and commonsense entailment[J].Linguistics and Philosophy,1993(5):437-493.
  • 10[10]Mann,W.& Thompson,S.Rhetorical structure theory:A theory of text organization[R].Technical report,Information Science Institute,1987.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Heim Irene.The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases,1982.
  • 2Jeroen Groenendijk,Martin Stokhof.Dynamic predicate logic[J]Linguistics and Philosophy,1991(1).
  • 3Cheng, L,J.C.-T. Huang.Two types of aonkey sentences,1994.
  • 4FraCaS.Describing the approaches,1994.
  • 5Karttunen,L.Discourse ReferentsSyntax and Semantics,1976.
  • 6Krahmer,Emiel,Reinhard Muskens.Negation and disjunction in discourse representation theoryJournal of Semantics,1995.
  • 7Krifka,Manfred.Introduction to semantics: Advanced topics,1994.
  • 8Spencer-Smith,R.Semantics and discourse representationLanguage and Mind,1987.
  • 9BarwiseJonPerryJohnSituations and Attitudes.
  • 10N.Asher.Reference to Abstract Objects in DiscourseSLAP,1993.

共引文献49

同被引文献47

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部