期刊文献+

论语言行为情态——情态及情态隐喻的认知语用分析 被引量:5

论语言行为情态——情态及情态隐喻的认知语用分析
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言行为图式是一充满了情态特征的图式,对于根情态,它的语用是隐性的,而认识情态突显了其中的断言性语言行为。对于情态隐喻而言,它是语言行为情态的全面体现,语言行为情态贯穿于根情态向认识情态、情态隐喻拓展的过程。在认知方面,根情态的动力——障碍图式在映射到认知域中体现为逻辑之力,在言行为情态中表现为言外之力。 Modality often appears together with the speech acts. In root modals, the pragmatic character is implicit. In epistemic modality, assertives are the main performatives. And speech acts co-occur with metaphor of modality. So speech acts come with modality. As for cognition, the dynamic-barrier schema in root modality is manifested as logic force when mapped into epistemic modality, and as illocutionary force in speech acts modality.
作者 张立新 张权
出处 《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2007年第2期54-57,69,共5页 Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
关键词 语言行为情态 情态隐喻 动力-障碍 speech acts modality metaphor of modality dynamic-barrier
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[1][18][23][27][28][29]Halliday,M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar(3rd)[M].London:Edward Arnold,2004.
  • 2[2]Lyons,J.Semantics[M].Cambridge:CPU,1977.
  • 3[3]Levinson.Pragmaics[M].CUP.1983:133-134.
  • 4[4][17][19]Langacker.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar(Volume Ⅱ):Descriptive Application[M].Peking University Press.2004.
  • 5[5]Papafragou.A.On Speech-Act Modality[J].Journal of Pragmatics.(32)2000.
  • 6杨信彰.英语的情态手段与语篇类型[J].外语与外语教学,2006(1):1-4. 被引量:67
  • 7[7][20]Hopper P.J.& Traugott E.C.Grammaticalization[M].Cambridge University Press.2003:93,56.
  • 8[10]Larreya.P.Types of modality and types of modalisation[C].Second International Conference on Modality in English.Pau 2-4 September 2004.
  • 9[12]Searle,J.Speech Acts[M].CUP.1969.
  • 10[13]Jaszczolt,K.M.Semantics and Pragmatics:Meaning in Language and Discourse[M].Person Education Ltd.2002:296.

二级参考文献14

  • 1杨信彰.语篇中的评价性手段[J].外语与外语教学,2003(1):11-14. 被引量:177
  • 2Aikhenvald, A. Y. Evidentiality: Problerm and Challenges [A]. In P.van Sterkenburg (ed.) Linguistics Today - Facing a Greater Challenge[C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004.
  • 3Bartlett, T. Mapping Distinction: Towards a Systemic Representation of Power in Language [A]. In L. Young and C. Harrison(eds.) Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis:Studies in Social Change [C]. London & New York;Continuum, 2004.
  • 4Biber, D. et al. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [M]. Pearson Education Limited, 1999.
  • 5Francis, W. N. & Kucera. Frequency Analysis of English Usage:Lezicon and Grammar[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1982.
  • 6Gotti, M. Shall and Will in Contemporary English: A Comparison with Past Uses [A]. In R. Facchinetti, M. Krug & F. Palmer(eds.) Modality in Contemporary English [C]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003.
  • 7HaUiday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar,(2nd ed. )[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
  • 8Kmtzer, A. Modality [A]. In A. yon Stechow & D. Wunderlich( eds. ) Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research [C]. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991.
  • 9Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed. )[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 2004.
  • 10Palmer, F..Mood and Modality [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

共引文献66

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部