象征之镜的生产和生产之镜的象征,或马克思和鲍德里亚

鲍德里亚批评马克思的逻辑有一个递进过程,从最初借助于马克思的拜物教理论发展出一种以符号(或形式)分析为核心的消费社会观,到对马克思主义“生产力”理论批评,最后以“象征交换”理论替代马克思的“生产”理论。在这一过程中,他把西方马克思主义哲学逻辑的失败原因追溯到马克思主义起点上,并借助于结构主义、精神分析和相关人类学成果构建了一种从象征关系入手对当代资本主义文化和意识形态的批判话语,但是在根本上“象征之镜”却是资本主义“生产之镜”话语之外的另一种非历史话语,批判本身成为与历史生成具体情境无关的一种话语反对另一种话语的斗争。在直接的意义上,鲍德里亚式的批评是当代左派激进文化批判的困境表现。

This paper points that there is a increasing process of critique logic of J. Baudrillard to Marx, namely, he starts with view of consumer society focussed on code analysis supported by Marx＇s theory of Faith to commodity, then he critizes theory of Marx＇s ＂production＂, finally he displacc the theory of Marx＇s ＂production＂ by the theory of ＂symbolic exchange＂. Dursing this process, he reoriginates the fallacy cause of philosophy logic of west Marxism to strarting point of Marxism, and which he constructs a kind of critique discouvse to culture and ideology of temporary capitalism from symbolic relation supported by construstionalism, Psyehoanalysis and some achievement about anthropology. However, his Miroir of production is another unhistorical discouse actuallu which is an outside discouvse of ＂Miroir of production＂ of capitalism. So the critique self because a kind of struggle of one discouvse agninst another one which has nothing with specific becoming situations. So to conclude that critique of J. Baudrillard is a kind of expression of culture critique of temporary radical left.