期刊文献+

李何论争的明代言说述评 被引量:2

Commentary on Ming Scholars' Speaking about the Polemic between LI Meng-yang and HE Jing-ming
下载PDF
导出
摘要 李梦阳和何景明的论争,明人大多认为是李欲压倒何而发动了论争,带有文人相轻的性质;对李何的论争观点,从文献反映的角度看,袒李派占了上风,比护何派和中立派都多。从中可见明代中晚期文学热衷复古而警惕师心的浓重风气。 Most Ming scholars considered that the polemic between LI Meng-yang and HE Jing-ming was "scholar belittling each other" because Li wished prevail over He and started the debate. But the shielding Li school got the run upon the protecting He and independent schools from the document remained. It is obvious that most scholars enjoyed "back to the ancients" and kept high eye upon "following the heart" in Middle and Later Ming Dynasty.
作者 冯小禄
出处 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2007年第2期61-65,共5页 Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 李梦阳 何景明 文人相轻 袒李派 护何派 中立派 LI Meng-yang HE Jing-ming " scholar belittling each other" school of shielding LI school of protecting HE independent school
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1冯晓庐.基于创作的诗人争论:李何之争评议[J].学术交流与动态,2005,(3):57-61.
  • 2[5]黄宗羲.明文海[M].北京:中华书局影印涵芬楼藏钞本,1987.
  • 3钱谦益.列朝诗集小传[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983..
  • 4李开先.李开先集[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 5[10]许学夷.诗源辩体[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1998.
  • 6朱彝尊.静志居诗话[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1998..
  • 7[13]何良俊.四友斋丛说(卷二十六)[M].北京:中华书局,1997.

共引文献71

同被引文献64

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部