《刑法修正案(六)》第七条和第八条之研讨

An Analysis of Article7 and Article8 of Amendment6 of Criminal Law

从刑事立法的演化进程看,刑法第一百六十三条和第一百六十四条是从贪污贿赂罪中逐渐剥离而分立出来的,实践中将其统称为商业贿赂罪的做法不够严谨科学。《刑法修正案(六)》第七条和第八条将刑法第一百六十三条和第一百六十四条的受贿主体由原来的“公司企业人员”扩展至“公司企业及其他单位工作人员”,为打击既非公司企业工作人员、也非从事公务的国家工作人员或准国家工作人员的收受贿赂行为及对之行贿的行为提供了法律依据。其罪名可确定为“非公务人员受贿罪”与“对非公务人员行贿罪”。司法适用中也应注意修正案的时间效力及法条援引方法。

In the perspective of criminal legislative evolution, Article 163 and Article 164 are gradually separated from the legislation on crimes of embezzlement and bribery. In judicial practice, they are often referred to as crime of commercial bribery, which is not scientific. In order to meet the objective requirements of social development, Article 7and Article 8 of Amendment 6 of Criminal Law expand the receivers of bribe prescribed in Article163 and Article 164 from original workers at company or enterprise to workers at company or enterprise or other unit ,which provides the legal instrument for punishing those neither workers at company or enterprise nor public officials taking bribes. The crimes prescribed in Article 163 and Article 164 after amendment should be named as crimes of non -public official taking bribes and crimes of offering bribes to non -public official. The time validity of amendment and quotation approach should be paid attention in judicial practice.