期刊文献+

地下水石油污染曝气治理技术研究 被引量:22

Study on the Groundwater Petroleum Contaminant Remediation by Air Sparging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在石油开采区现场考察了地下水石油污染曝气治理效果.结果表明,现场土壤地质条件对曝气气流分布影响很大,气流分布并不与曝气井为轴对称,曝气井左侧影响距离达6 m,右侧仅为4 m;经过40 d的连续曝气,在气流分布密度大的区域,石油去除率高达70%,而在气流分布稀疏的区域,石油去除率只有40%,曝气影响区地下水石油平均去除率为60%;对曝气前后地下水中石油组分进行色质联机分析,表明石油去除效果与石油组分及其性质有关,挥发性高的石油组分容易挥发去除,而挥发性低的石油组分难于挥发去除,因此地下水石油污染曝气治理存在“拖尾效应”. The groundwater petroleum contaminant remediation effect by air sparging was investigated in an oil field. The results show that the soil geological situation has great influence on the air distribution, and the shape of air distribution is not symmetrical to the air sparging (AS) well as axis. The influence distance in the left of AS well is 6 m, and only 4 m in the right. The petroleum removal rate can reach 70% in the zone with higher air saturation, but only 40% in the zone with lower air saturation, and the average petroleum removal rate reaches 60% in the influence zone for 40 days continuous air sparging. The petroleum components in groundwater were analyzed by GC/MS (gas chromatogrammass spectrograph) before and after experiments, respectively. The results show that the petroleum removal rate has relationship with the components and their properties. The petroleum components with higher volatility are easily removed by volatilization, but those with lower volatility are difficult to remove, so a tailing effect of lingering residual contaminant exists when the air sparging technology is adopted to treat groundwater contaminated by petroleum products.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期754-760,共7页 Environmental Science
基金 教育部重大科技基金项目(2004-295)
关键词 地下水 石油污染 曝气 挥发性 气流分布 groundwater petroleum contamination air sparging volatility air distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1陈余道,朱学愚,刘建立,徐绍辉.淄博市乙烯厂区包气带中石油物质的分布特征及归宿[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),1998,34(3):371-375. 被引量:11
  • 2Rivett M O,Petts J,Butler B,et al.Remediation of contaminated land and groundwater:experience in England and Wales[J].Journal of Water Science and Technology,2000,159:251 ~ 268.
  • 3Paul C Johnson,Richard L Johnson,Cristin L Bruce.Advance in in-situ air sparging/bio-sparging[J].Journal of Bioremediation,2001,5:251~266.
  • 4David H Bass,Nicholas A Hastings,Richard A Brown.Performance of air sparging system:a review of case studies[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2000,72:101 ~ 119.
  • 5Clark L.Groundwater and subsurface remediation:research strategies for in situ technology[J].Journal of Environmental Pollution,1996,94:101 ~ 102.
  • 6Younger P L.Groundwater and subsurface remediation:research strategies for in-situ technology[J].Journal of Hydrology,1997,192:383 ~ 386.
  • 7Washington Braida,Say Kee Ong.Modeling of air sparging of VOC-contaminated soil columns[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2000,41:385~402.
  • 8Reddy K R,Adams J A.Effects of soil heterogeneity on airflow patterns and hydrocarbon removal during in situ air sparging[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2001,127:234 ~ 247.
  • 9Benner Michael L,Mohtar Rabi H,Lee Linda S.Factors affecting air sparging remediation systems using field data and numerical simulations[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2002,95:305 ~ 329.
  • 10Tomlinsona D W,Thomson N R.Air distribution in the Borden aquifer during in situ air sparging[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2003,67:113 ~ 132.

共引文献10

同被引文献306

引证文献22

二级引证文献148

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部