期刊文献+

保险合同除外条款及其控制——对保险霸王条款现象之冷思考 被引量:3

Excluding Clauses in Insurance Contract and the Control of It——Calm Thinking on the Phenomena of Strong Clauses in Insurance Contract
下载PDF
导出
摘要 保险合同中的除外条款既是合同自由的表现,又是保险之本质要求。但基于保险合同的附和性、保险专业性以及保险信息不对称的因素,有必要对保险合同中的除外条款予以控制,以达合同正义与保险业健康发展之功效。通过对除外条款予以司法、立法、行政上的控制,以实现对弱势的保险消费者予以特别保护。各国保险的先进理念及立法之实例,对我国目前保险立法的借鉴大有裨益。 The excluding clauses in insurance contract are both the express of contract freedom and the natural demandment of insurance. Based on the adhesion of insurance contract , specialty of insurance, and asymmetrical information, it is necessary to contract the excluding clauses for contract justice and healthy development of insurance industry. Through judical ,legislative and administrative control, it can provide special protection for weak insurance consumers. The advanced ideas and legislation of many countries'insurance industry are beneficial to the China's insurance legislation which is undertaking.
作者 李娟
出处 《沙洋师范高等专科学校学报》 2007年第2期20-23,共4页 Journal of Shayang Teachers College
关键词 保险合同 除外条款 司法控制 立法控制 行政控制 Insurance contract Excluding clauses Judical control Legislative control Administrative control
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1缪里尔·L·克劳福特;周伏平.人寿与健康保险,2000.
  • 2肯尼思·布莱克;孙祁祥.人寿与健康保险,2003.
  • 3约翰·道宾.保险法,2001.
  • 4特瑞斯·普雷切特;孙祁祥.风险管理与保险,1998.
  • 5樊启荣.美国保险法上“合理期待原则”评析[J].法商研究,2004,21(3):117-126. 被引量:54
  • 6詹姆斯·S·特里斯曼;裴平.风险管理与保险,2002.
  • 7Mark·S·Dorfman;齐瑞宗.代风险管理与保险教程,2002.
  • 8叶启洲.保险契约之内容控制,1997(27).
  • 9P·S·阿狄亚;赵旭东.合同法导论,2002.
  • 10江朝国.保险法基础理论,2002.

二级参考文献25

  • 1[美]约翰·亨利·梅利曼 顾培东 禄正平译.《大陆法系》[M].法律出版社,2004年版.第87页.第44页.
  • 2See Scott B. Krider, The Rtmastruxction of Insurance Contracts Under the Doctrine of Reascoable Expectations,18J. MARSHALL. REV. 155(1984).
  • 3Delancy v. Rockingham Farmers Mutual Insurance Co, 52 N.H. 581,587(1913).
  • 4Bowler v .Fidelity and Contyact and Choice of New York, 53 N.J.313,250 A. 2d 580 (1969).
  • 5Abranham, Freedom Contract and Coice of Law in Insurance, 93 Harvard Law Review 1981, p. 109.
  • 6Stephen J. Ware,A Critique of the Returnable Expectations Doctrine ,56 University of Chicago Law Review 1461,1463-1475(Fall 1989), p.267, p.296.
  • 7Mark C. Rahdert, Reasonable Expectations Reconsidered,18 Connecticut Law Review 323, 334 (1986).
  • 8Aiu ins co v fmc corp ,247 calrptr 820, 831 (1990).
  • 9Abrahams v. Medkerranean Ins & Reins Co Ltd (1991) 1 LIoyd's Rep,p. 114.
  • 10Youell v. Blard Wdch & Co Ltd(1992) 2 Loyd's Rep p. 127.

共引文献55

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部