期刊文献+

全髋关节置换术后病人健康相关生存质量评估 被引量:25

Evaluation of health-related quality of life in total hip arthroplasty patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]评价Harris评分在全髋关节置换术疗效评估中的局限性。[方法]对2005年9月~2006年1月47例(50髋)接受全髋关节置换术的病人进行6个月的前瞻性研究。在术前和术后6个月均对病人进行Harris评分和评估健康相关生存质量的SF-36简明健康状况调查量表(MOS36-item Short Form Health Survey,SF-36)评分,并分析Harris评分和SF-36各项评分之间的相关性。[结果]病人术后6个月的Harris评分和SF-36各项评分均较术前有统计学意义上的差异(P〈0.001),但SF-36各项评分的改善程度并不一致。Harris评分和SF-36生理功能(PF)和躯体疼痛(BP)项评分有相关性(r〉0.4,P〈0.001),但与SF-36其它方面评分无明显相关性(r〈0.4),或无相关性(P〉0.05)。[结论]虽然Harris评分能较好地评估全髋关节置换术对改善病人生理功能和缓解疼痛的疗效,但对于评价病人健康相关生存质量和其它方面的改善还存在局限性。因此,有必要将SF-36评分引入到全髋关节置换术的疗效评估中。 [ Objective ] To evaluate the limitations of Harris hip Score (HHS) in outcome assessments of total hip arthroplasty (THA). [ Method] Based on a prospective study design,from Sep. 2005 to Jan. 2006,47 eligible patients (50 hips ) who had had total hip arthroplasty were interviewed and measured by the Harris hip Score (HHS) and Chinese - version Short - form 36 - item Health Survey (SF -36) before and six months after operations. The differences between the scores before and after operations were tested with t - test and the correlation between HHS and the SF - 36 domains were tested with Pearson correlation. [ Result] Both the HHS and eight domains of SF - 36 were significantly improved 6 months after operations compared with the scores before operations. However,except for the correlations between HHS and Physical Function (PF) and Bodily Pain (BP) domains of SF - 36 were significant ( r 〉 0.4,P 〈 0. 001 ) ,other domains of SF - 36 had poor ( r 〈 0. 4) or no correlations ( P 〉 0.05 ) with HHS. [ Conclusion] The result of this study suggest that HHS can not capture additional important quality of life domains except for physical function and pain relief that are influenced by THA. So it's necessary to combine HHS and a quality of life survey such as SF- 36 to allow a more global assessment of THA.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期415-417,共3页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 关节成形术 髋关节 生存质量 arthroplasty hip joint quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Garbuz DS,Xu M,Duncan CP,et al.Delays worsen quality of life outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty[J].Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research,2006,447:79-84.
  • 2Ethgen O,Bruyere O,Richy F,et al.Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty.A qualitative and systematic review of the literature[J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2004,86A (5):963 -74.
  • 3Ware J,Gandek B.Overview of SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1998,51(11):903 -912.
  • 4崔旭,张伯勋,李静东.人工全髋关节置换术治疗56例强直性脊柱炎的临床研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(9):666-668. 被引量:26
  • 5喻忠,王黎明,宋华荣,桂鉴超.严重髋关节屈曲强直畸形关节置换[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(11):817-820. 被引量:11
  • 6Tompkins GS,Jacobs JJ,Kull LR,et al.Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component.Seven-to-ten year results[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1997,79:169-76.
  • 7万崇华,方积乾,史明丽,陈丽影,张玉祖.MOS SF-36量表用于药物成瘾者生命质量测定的对比研究[J].中国行为医学科学,1998,7(4):260-261. 被引量:121
  • 8韦懿芸,颜艳,王多劳,郭艳芳,张磊,孙振球.中文版SF-36在社区老年人生存质量评价中的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2006,31(2):184-188. 被引量:98
  • 9Nilsdotter AK,Petersson IF,Roos EM,et al.Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis:a prospective study[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases,2003,62(10):923-930.

二级参考文献36

  • 1廉永云,裴福兴.髋关节骨性融合的人工全髋关节置换术[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(20):1581-1584. 被引量:8
  • 2卢世璧.坎贝尔骨科手术学[M](第9版)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.1054-5.
  • 3Peek MK,Ray L,Patel K,et al.Reliability and validity of the SF-36 among older mexican Americans[J].Gerontologist,2004,144(3):418-425.
  • 4Han CW,Lee EJ,Iwaya T,et al.Development of the Korean version short-form 36 Item health survey:health related QOL of healthy elderly people and elderly patients in korea[J].Tohoku J Exp Med,2004,203(3):189-194.
  • 5Mallinson S.Listening to respondents:a qualitative assessment of short-form 36 health status questionnaire[J].Soc Sci Med,2002,54(1):11-21.
  • 6Tseng HM,Lu JF,Gandek B.Culture Issues in using the SF-36 health survey in asia:results from taiwan[J].Health Qual Life Outcomes,2003,26;1(1):72-81.
  • 7Van Swearingen JM,Brach JS.Making geriatric assessment work:selecting useful measures[J].Phys Ther,2001,81(6):1233-1252.
  • 8Tsai SY,Chi LY,Lee LS,et al.Health-related quality of life among urban,rural,and island community elderly in Taiwan[J].J Formos Med Assoc,2004,103(3):196-204.
  • 9Masud R,Masud T.Mesuring quality of life in osteoporosis[J].Age Ageing,2001,30(4):371-373.
  • 10Lam CLK,Fong DYT,Lauder IJ,et al.The effect of health-related qualityof life (HRQOL) on health service utilisation of a Chinese population[J].Soc Sci Med,2002,55(9):1635-1646.

共引文献245

同被引文献172

引证文献25

二级引证文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部