诸侯争“话”与争“道”——也谈文学理论边界问题

Dispute among Big Crocodiles at the Academic——talking about the literature theories boundary

文学理论遭遇到内忧外患,一方面是自身沉重的历史,导致教学研究与现实脱节,另一方面,也是根本的方面,社会现实已经大大的变化了。而文学理论界应对境域变化的态度则比较复杂,大体可分为四派:保守派、坚定派、反思派和折中派。各路诸侯争论背后的目的和苦衷在保守派和坚定派对垒中展露无疑。突破传统界限,面向广阔生动的现实,揭示问题、分析问题,提出解决问题的可能方法应该是更务实的道路,由此,当前最急切的问题是应对教学脱离社会实践和不能适应学生需求的状况,由此文学理论教材编写问题就突出前台,解决的关键不是一劳永逸或彻底的态度,而是不断探索具体问题的行动。

The literature theories falls among internal revolt and foreign invasion, which is an oneself on the other hand heavy history, cause the teaching research and reality become disjointed, and which is a basic aspect on the other hand, the social reality has already changed consumedly. But the literature theories field reply complicatedly, the big body can is divided into four parties： Conservative parties, firmness parties, introspect parties and compromising parties. The purpose and real intentions of big crocodiles at the academic are revealed doubtlessly in the opposing camps of conservative parties and the firmness parties. It is the more practical road for breaking traditional boundary, facing to vast vivid reality, announcing to public a problem, analyzing a problem, and putting forward the method of solving problem. So, the most anxious problem is the condition that the teaching escape from a society and cant adapt studentg need at present, from here, writing a good teaching material of literature theories becomes the outstanding stage, the key of resolving problem is not the attitude of doing once and for all, but the activity that investigates a concrete problem continuously.