期刊文献+

台湾河川流域淹水指数评估研究 被引量:1

Evaluation of inundation index for river basins in Taiwan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前水利主管机关为有效管理流域中下游洪水灾害,已建立许多防洪治水工程,包括堤防、排水系统及抽水站等,但随着集水区中上游土地利用急剧改变,致使原先设计之防洪设施可能已不足应付开发所增加之洪流量,因此近年来已投入适当资源,并以工程与非工程防洪方法并重为原则,让台湾防洪工作进入崭新的一页。本研究主要是选定淹水指数评估参数之项目,并以阶层分析程序法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,A.H.P.)及所设计之专家学者问卷,决定淹水指数评估参数之权重,以研拟河川流域淹水指数评估方法,与评估河川流域淹水损失之严重性,未来将可应用于评估河川防洪排水等整治工程之施设优先顺序,并做为评定工程整治后成效以及满足防灾应变预警之参考。目前研究以淡水河、头前溪、浊水溪、高屏溪及秀姑峦溪为例,根据其水文、水理及人文现况,进行淹水指数试算,其淹水指数分别为60.1、36.9、33.4、38.3及35.2。由于本次试算中,因某些参数资料难以获得,所以在试算中是以初估之方式进行评估,建议未来可配合实际现况,对各项评估参数之评分标准做适当之调整,以使淹水指数之计算更为合理。 Numerous flood disaster mitigation and prevention structures were built by Water Resources Agency (WRA) for improving the watershed management in Taiwan, including banks, drainage systems and pumping stations. Due to the changes of land exploitation in many major watersheds, the original designs for these structures are incapable to achieve flood prevention objectives. Recently, inundation areas for most of rivers in Taiwan have been delineated to provide information by nonstructural measures for floodplain management. The main purpose of this study is to establish the inundation index by Analytic Hierarchy Process (A. H. P. ) method, which can provide quantifiable information to assess the construction efficiency of the flood structures and to support the decision making of the flood emergency responds.
出处 《泥沙研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期49-62,共14页 Journal of Sediment Research
关键词 淹水指数 阶层分析程序法 inundation index Analytic Hierarchy Process (A. H. P. )
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Saaty,T.L.1980.The analytic hierarchy process.New York,U.S.:McGraw-Hill.
  • 2Saaty,T.L.; Vargas,L.G..1982.The logic of priorities.Boston,U.S.:Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
  • 3Saaty,T.L.1988.Decision making for leaders:the analytical hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world.Pa.:University of Pittsburgh.
  • 4Saaty,T.L.; Vargas,L.G..1991.Prediction,projection and forecasting.Boston,U.S.:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 5邓振源 曾国雄.层级分析法(AHP)的内涵特性与应用(上).中国统计学报,1989,27(6):5-22.
  • 6邓振源 曾国雄.层级分析法(AHP)的内涵特性与应用(下).中国统计学报,1989,27(7):1-20.
  • 7卢渊源.分析层级程序法(AHP method)之应用.金属工业,1994,28(1):19-22.
  • 8巨廷工程顾问股份有限公司.区域排水淹水指数研究评估计划[R].台湾水利处,2000.
  • 9郑思苹.都会区台洪灾害损失之分析与评估[D].台湾大学生物环境系统工程学研究所博士论文,2003.
  • 10台湾水利署.2003年台湾水文年报总册.2004.

共引文献3

同被引文献10

  • 1龙笛,张思聪,樊朝宇.流域生态系统健康评价研究[J].资源科学,2006,28(4):38-44. 被引量:35
  • 2Vesterby M. and R. Heimlich, Land Use and Demographic Change: Results from Fast-Growth Counties[J]. Land Economics,1991, 76(3), 279- 291.
  • 3李永展 何纪芳.土地资源永续利用指标架构之建立--以中部区域为例.土地经济年刊,1998,9:73-102.
  • 4黄希达.河川高滩地维护与管理机制之探讨--以台北县为例[D].台湾台中,国立中央大学土木工程研究所硕士论文,2003.
  • 5Saaty, T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • 6Gamini. Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process[J]. G Herath Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 70 : 33, 263 - 273.
  • 7Strager, M. P. and R. S. Rosenberger. Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: Weights and Measures in Spatial MCA[J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57, 627- 639.
  • 8Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G.. The Logic of Priorities, Applications in Business, Energy, Health, Transportation [ M]. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing Co., 1982.
  • 9Drake, P.R. (1998) 'Using the analytic hierarchy process in engineering education[ J]. International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 14, No. 3, 191- 196.
  • 10卢渊源.分析层级程序法(AHP method)之应用.金属工业,1994,28(1):19-22.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部