期刊文献+

质化编码技术在内容效度验证中的应用 被引量:2

Application of qualitative coding method in content validity study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:尝试将质化编码技术用于对问卷的内容效度研究.方法:在公文筐测验研究工作过程中采用质化研究的方法对测验内容效度进行分析,并与传统的专家评定内容效度的方法进行比较.结果:采用质化编码技术获取情景模拟测验项目内容或绩效考核项目内容的时候,在保证编码一致性达到85%的基础上,和专家评定内容效度吻合程度良好.结论:质化研究的方法可以作为一般量化研究方法的先验步骤和所要量化的内容结果的验证方法,进一步证实可以将质化研究和量化研究相互作为预研究和验证研究的循环混合研究模式的思想,供研究者作为参考. AIM: To find out whether qualitative coding method can be applied to study the content validity of aptitude test. METHODS: Both qualitative coding method and Delphi method were applied during the content validity analysis of an In-basket test. Winter's coding category agreement coefficient (CA coefficient) was applied to study the consistency between the two methods. RESULTS: The content validities were consistent between these two different methods when the CA of qualitative coding method was above 85%. CONCLUSION: Qualitative coding method can he applied into the quantitative research as a method of content validity study. It can draw some inferences that the mixed model may he meaningful for psychometric research.
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 北大核心 2007年第8期741-743,共3页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
关键词 定性研究 编码技术 内容效度 qualitative research coding method content validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Tashakkori A,Teddlie C.Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,2003:1-8.
  • 2张红川,王耘.论定量与定性研究的结合问题及其对我国心理学研究的启示[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2001(4):99-105. 被引量:36
  • 3秦金亮,郭秀艳.论心理学两种研究范式的整合趋向[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):20-23. 被引量:24
  • 4Katrin N,The combined use of qualitative and quantitative methods in educational research[D],Tallinn pedagogical university dissertations on social sciences,2004:4-22.
  • 5Ronald JC,Mark ES,Psychological testing and assessment[M].6th edition,McGraw-Hill Co.and Posts & Telecom Press,2005:159-160.
  • 6Spencer JM,Spencer SM.魏海金译.Competence at work[M].汕头:汕头大学出版社,2003:139-187.
  • 7秦金亮.心理学研究方法新趋向-质化研究方法评述.山西师大学报:社会科学版,2000,27(3):11-16.
  • 8陈向明.“质的研究”中研究者如何进入研究现场.高等教育研究,1997,87(4):61-67.
  • 9Strauss A.Qualitative analysis for social scientists[M],Cambridge,UK.University of Cambridge Press,1987:64.
  • 10Maxwell JA,Qualitative research design:An interactive approach[M],Thousands Oaks:Sage Publication,1996:138-144.

二级参考文献26

  • 1卜卫.方法论的选择: 定性还是定量[J].国际新闻界,1997,19(5):49-54. 被引量:28
  • 2郭祖仪,霍涌泉.超越危机 走向成熟——世纪之交中国心理学的发展走向[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,26(2):66-73. 被引量:6
  • 3[1]Breakweel, G, Hammond, S& Fife - Schaw, e Research methods in psychology,Sage Publications. 1995
  • 4[2]McQueen,R. & Knussen,C. Research methods in psychology:a practica introduction,Prentice Hall Europe. 1999
  • 5[3]Krathwohl, D. R. Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach[M]. 2nd Ed. AddisonWesley Educational Publisher, I nc. 1998
  • 6[4]Lundin,R. W. Theories and systems of psychology. Toronto:Heath andCompany. 1991
  • 7[5]Kilpatrick,J. Variables and methodologies in research in problem solving, In Mathematical problem solving, ed. by L. Hatfield, Cambridge Univevsity Pres. 1978
  • 8[6]Patton,M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd Ed. Newbury Park:sage. 1990
  • 9[7]Guba, E. G (Eds) The paradigm dialogue. Newbury Park:ge. 1990
  • 10[8]Jacob,E Qualitative research traditions: a review. Review of Educational Research, 1987,57 ( 1 ): 1 - 50

共引文献59

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部