期刊文献+

虹膜识别技术在准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视性散光中的临床研究 被引量:7

Iris recognize-guided LASIK with Zyoptix-System for correction of myopic astigmatism
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价虹膜识别技术应用于准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视性散光的准确性、稳定性及可预测性。方法采用虹膜识别引导的LASIK治疗近视散光患者97例(183只眼),按术前柱镜度数分为3组:1组(-0.50~-1.00D)79只眼,2组(-1.25~-2.00D)70只眼,3组(-2.25~4.00D)34只眼;按术前柱镜轴向分为组A(循规散光)106只眼、组B(逆规散光)43只眼、组C(斜轴散光)34只眼。术前采集散瞳前后的虹膜数据和波阵面像差数据,经过虹膜识别后形成ate文件,将该数据同Orbsesn角膜地形图系统产生的ore文件相结合设计手术方案形成tls文件,导入准分子激光系统,激光器对平卧位时术眼再次进行虹膜识别,确定瞳孔中心偏移量和眼球旋转角度,在治疗时加以补偿,术中三维眼球自动跟踪系统监测眼球运动。观察手术前后不同时期的视力、散光度及轴向变化。结果术中检测出瞳孔中心总体的偏移量为X轴方向(0.41±98.90)μm、Y轴方向(109.15±141.35)μm、眼球旋转偏移角度0.83°±3.40°,术中对其加以补偿。术后6个月裸眼视力≥0.5者183只眼(100.0%),≥1.0者169只眼(92.3%),散光度由术前(-1.54±0.65)D减少为术后6个月的(-0.26±0.25)D,对术后各时间点的样本总体散光度进行单因素方差分析,差异有统计学意义(F=5.74,P〈0.01)。各组间两两比较采用SNK检验,术后1周与1、3、6个月比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);术后1、3、6个月之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.88)。术后6个月顺规散光下降为45只眼(24.6%),逆规散光下降为31只眼(16.6%),斜轴散光上升为38只眼(21.0%),术后6个月有69只眼(37.8%)成为无散光眼。结论虹膜识别引导的LASIK治疗近视散光效果良好,准确性及可预测性较高,是目前精确、先进、有效的散光治疗方法之一。 Objective To assess the safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and changes in cylindrical degree and axis after iris recoguize-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 4. 01 System for the correction of myopic astigmatism. Methods The present study was a prospective, nonrandomized, self-controlled trial. Iris recognize-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 4.01 System ( Bausch & Lomb ) was performed in 97 patients ( 183 eyes) with myopic astigmatism in a 6-month trial. Patients were divided into 3 group according to the pre-operative cylindrical degree: Group 1, -0. 50 to -1.00D, 79 eyes; Group 2, - 1.25 to -2. 00D, 70 eyes; Group 3, 2. 00 to 4. 00D, 34 eyes. They were also grouped by preoperative astigmatism axis: Group A, with the rule (WTR) astignlatism, 126 eyes; Group B, against the rule (ATR), 34 eyes; Group C, oblique axis astigmatism, 23 eyes. After a Hansatome microkeratome cut, iris recognized wavefrent-based excimer ablation (Zyoptix 100 ) was performed. The degree and axis of astigmatism preoperative and at various times post-operatively ( 1 day, 1 month, 3 month and 6 months) were analyzed and compared. Results At 6 month post-operatively, uncorrected visual acuity (VA) was 1.0 or better in 92. 3% of the eyes, and 0. 5 or better in all eyes. No eye lost ≥1 lines of best spectacle-corrected VA (BSCVA) at 6 month post-operatively; 60 eyes gained 1 line of BSCVA, and 22 eyes gained 2 lines. The cylindrical degree of astigmatism decreased from ( - 1.54 + 0. 65 ) D of pre-operation to ( - 0. 26 + 0. 25 ) D (6 month, post-operatively), the difference between these two groups was statistically significant. The uncorrected VA (UCVA) and the degree of astigmatism returned to normal in the first week and tended to be stable after 1 month. Six months after the operation, WTR astigmatism decreased froml06 eyes (peroperation) to 45 eyes (pest-operation). ATR stigmatism decreased from 43 eyes (per-operation) to 31 eyes (post-operation). Oblique astigmatism increased from 34 to 38 eyes. Sixty-nine eyes became non-astigmatism 6 months after the operation. Conclusion Iris recognize-guided LASIK using Zyoptix is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of myopic astigmatism.
出处 《中华眼科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期324-328,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
关键词 角膜磨镶术 激光原位 虹膜 散光 Keratomileusis, laser in situ Iris Astigmatism
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Wu HK. Astigmatism and LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2002,13:250-255.
  • 2Kohnen T, Buhren J, Kuhne C, et al. Wavefront-guided LASIK(with the Zyoptix 3. 1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations. Ophthalmology,2004, 111:2175-2185.
  • 3Shaikh NM, Manche EE. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 28:485-490.
  • 4Kanjani N, Jacob S, Agarwal A, et al. Wavefront-and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix. J Cataract Refract Surg,2004,30:398-402.

同被引文献54

  • 1杜之渝,吴宁玲,张大勇,郭红,郑晴,晏丕松.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜基质床厚度安全值分析[J].中华眼科杂志,2004,40(11):741-744. 被引量:50
  • 2接标,吴仕勇,齐怀峰,刘冠晓,杨秀国.基于ICA的在线掌纹识别[J].计算机工程与设计,2006,27(18):3433-3435. 被引量:4
  • 3薛玉利,彭玉华,周新虹.基于实值Gabor变换的掌纹识别[J].计算机工程与应用,2007,43(6):216-219. 被引量:10
  • 4Hori- Komai Y, Sakai C, Toda I, et al. Detection of cyclotorsional rotation during excimer laser ablation in LASIK. J Refract Surg 2007 ; 23 (8) :911-915.
  • 5Chang J. Cyclotorsion during laser in situ kertomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008 ; 34 ( 9 ) : 1720-1726.
  • 6Erdem U, Muftuoglu O, Gundogan FC, et al. Pupil center shift relative to the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex under natural and pharmacologically dilated conditions. J Refract Surg 2008 ;24(4) :530-538.
  • 7Porter J, Yoon G, MacRae S, et al. Surgeon offsets and dynamic eye movements in laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31 ( 11 ) :2508-2512.
  • 8Ciccio AE, Durrie DS, Stahl JE, et al. Ocular cyclotorsion during customized laser ablation. J Refract Surg 2005 ;21 (6) :S772-S774.
  • 9Swami AU, Steinert RE, Osbone WE, et al. Rotational malposition during laser in situ kertomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133(4) : 561-562.
  • 10Park SH, Kim M, Joo CK. Measurement of pupil centroid shift and Cyclotorsional displacementusing iris registration. Ophthalmologica 2009; 223(2) :166-171.

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部