摘要
在几何图形性质的哲学问题上,康德的观点为先验构成意义上的非柏拉图主义,胡塞尔的观点为经验建构意义上的柏拉图主义,维特根斯坦的观点为解构意义上的反柏拉图主义。胡塞尔关于几何图形的观点较之于康德与维特根斯坦具有较多的合理性。
This paper analyzes Kant, Husserl and Wittgenstein's ideas in their approaches to the philosophical problems of geometric figure. The author points out that Kant's idea is non-Platonism in a sense of priori construction, Husserl's idea Platonism in a sense of experiential constitution, and Wittgenstein's idea anti-Platonism in a sense of deconstruction. In addition, the author argues that Husserl's idea is more reasonable than Kant and Wittgenstein's.
出处
《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
2007年第1期13-18,共6页
Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)