期刊文献+

标准化影响因子在不同学科期刊比较中的应用 被引量:21

Using standard value system in assessment of scientific journals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 影响因子被用来评价科技期刊、科研人员及科研机构的学术水平,但由于学科间规模、发展速度不同,导致不同学科的期刊拥有不同的半衰期和文献利用规律,因此把影响因子直接用于不同学科间期刊的评价是不公平的。为了避免这种不公平,提出了“标准化影响因子”的概念,它通过对科技期刊的影响因子进行一次非线性转换和线性转换而得到,可以减小影响因子在评价不同学科期刊时的误差。 The impact factors of academic journals have been used to measure capacity, efficiency and quality of researchers and research institutions. While the journal assessment using impact factors is unfair in different disciplines due to different half-life and citing density. To minimize the inaccuracy and unfairness of using journal impact factors in evaluating and comparing the quality of journals, researchers and research institutions in different disciplines, this study proposes a standard value system. In this system, the journal impact factors are transformed to standard values conforming to normal distribution by nonlinear conversion. The standard value system will minimize the discrepancies of the impact factor assessment across the disciplines by considering the journal ranking in the discipline.
出处 《编辑学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期158-160,共3页 Acta Editologica
关键词 科技期刊 影响因子 标准化系统 scientific journal impact factor standard value system
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Garfield E.How can impact factor be improved?[J].Br Med J,1996,313:411-413
  • 2Garfield E.The use of JCR and JPI in measuring short and long term journal impact[J].Council Sci Edit Ann,2000
  • 3Bordons M,Fernandez M T,Gomez I.Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country[J].Scientometrics,2002,53:195-206
  • 4Sombatsompop N,Markpin T.Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields[J].JASIST,2005,56(7):676-683
  • 5Neuberger J,Counsell C.Impact factors:Uses and abuses[J].Eur J Gastroenterol Hematol,2002,14:209-211
  • 6Scully C,Lodge H.Impact factors and their significance:overrated and misused?[J].Br Dent J,2005,198(7):391-393
  • 7Porta M,Copete J L,Fernandez E,et al.Mixing journal,article,and author citations,and other pitfalls in the bibliographic impact factor[J].Rio de Janeiro,2003,19 (6):1847-1862
  • 8Kumis A.Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor[J].J Bone Joint Surg,2003,85:2449-2453
  • 9自然科学学术期刊评价指标体系研究课题组.自然科学学术期刊综合评价指标体系的特点和使用[J].中国科技期刊研究,2001,12(6):434-437. 被引量:56
  • 10中国科学技术信息研究所.中国科技期刊引证报告:2005年版[R].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2005:131

二级参考文献6

共引文献73

同被引文献199

引证文献21

二级引证文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部