司法的悖论——司法的民主化与司法的精英化之矛盾探究

Judicial Paradox——Researching the conflict of judicial democratization and elite

针对当前中国学者围绕中国司法制度改革中所面临的一对主要矛盾,即司法的民主化与司法的精英化之矛盾所展开的争论进行探讨,试图以内在的视角考察西方司法制度的历史,揭示作为司法手段的司法的精英化与司法的民主化之间存在的张力,进而阐明西方人是如何运用自己的智慧协调二者之间的关系寻求二者之间的和谐并使之共同服务于司法的目的,即公正裁判维护社会正义。而对于中国目前的司法改革来说应当如何处理二者之间的关系,在弄清司法之目的基础上应当以内在的视角考察中国当下的司法传统,在此基础之上,寻找作为人类共识的思维方式之中的共性。

In this article, we present China scholars from China judicial system reform which they face one pair of the principal contradiction, that is, the conflict between judicial democratization and judicial elitism which launched the controversy to explore and attempt to inquire the western judicial system history with internal perspective, reveals the tension which exists between the judicial elite and democratization as a kind of judicial means of judicial, thereby expounded the westerners how to use their intelligent to coordinate their relationship, to look for the harmony among them and enable the common services in the administration of justice purpose, that is, to justice for safeguarding social justice. For China＇s current judicial reforms how to deal with the relationship between them, I believe basing on the clear purpose of justice we should inquire the current judicial tradition with internal perspective in China, on this basis, find as human＇s a consensus among the common way of thinking.